X0 Socket - Xwindows
This is a discussion on X0 Socket - Xwindows ; why does the X0 socket have world rwx permissions?
I notice no difference in the way KDE works when
I chmod 700 X0.
Thanks.
--
Using OpenBSD with or without X & KDE?
http://dfeustel.home.mindspring.com...
-
X0 Socket
why does the X0 socket have world rwx permissions?
I notice no difference in the way KDE works when
I chmod 700 X0.
Thanks.
--
Using OpenBSD with or without X & KDE?
http://dfeustel.home.mindspring.com
-
Re: X0 Socket
dfeustel@mindspring.com writes in comp.windows.x:
|why does the X0 socket have world rwx permissions?
Because you may want to allow other UID's to access your display and
X has it's own authentication mechanisms (xhost and xauth) to allow
for that.
--
Alan Coopersmith * alanc@alum.calberkeley.org * Alan.Coopersmith@Sun.COM
http://blogs.sun.com/alanc/ * http://people.freedesktop.org/~alanc/
http://del.icio.us/alanc/ * http://www.csua.berkeley.edu/~alanc/
Working for, but definitely not speaking for, Sun Microsystems, Inc.
-
Re: X0 Socket
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> dfeustel@mindspring.com writes in comp.windows.x:
> |why does the X0 socket have world rwx permissions?
>
> Because you may want to allow other UID's to access your display and
> X has it's own authentication mechanisms (xhost and xauth) to allow
> for that.
That's what I surmised. What I have experienced recently is that
I am getting kde DCOP authorization error messages where some process
is generating error messages in the logfile by attempting to access
the socket when its permissions are set to 700. I am the only user of
the system where this is happening. It looks to me like DCOP
and Konqueror (the only two kde/X programs I am running) have some
security problems that make running with X0 permissions set to 700
a useful security measure.
--
Using OpenBSD with or without X & KDE?
http://dfeustel.home.mindspring.com