Re: Future of GNOME - X
This is a discussion on Re: Future of GNOME - X ; A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, Jennifer Smith wrote:
> I don't get all the fuss about it. Use Dropline Gnome and be done with it.
> Personally I'd say drop KDE too. If people want ...
-
Re: Future of GNOME
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, Jennifer Smith wrote:
> I don't get all the fuss about it. Use Dropline Gnome and be done with it.
> Personally I'd say drop KDE too. If people want either WM they can get
> Gnome via Dropline, and KDE via Konstruct.
Neither Gnome nor KDE are window managers.
They are correctly characterized either as:
a) Application frameworks, or
b) Applications created using those frameworks.
--
select 'cbbrowne' || '@' || 'acm.org';
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/x.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #177. "If a scientist with a beautiful and
unmarried daughter refuses to work for me, I will not hold her
hostage. Instead, I will offer to pay for her future wedding and her
children's college tuition."
-
Re: Future of GNOME
Christopher Browne wrote in message news:<2t62t4F1qq8ecU4@uni-berlin.de>...
> A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, Jennifer Smith wrote:
> > I don't get all the fuss about it. Use Dropline Gnome and be done with it.
> > Personally I'd say drop KDE too. If people want either WM they can get
> > Gnome via Dropline, and KDE via Konstruct.
>
> Neither Gnome nor KDE are window managers.
>
> They are correctly characterized either as:
>
> a) Application frameworks, or
> b) Applications created using those frameworks.
"Application frameworks". "Applications created using those
frameworks" are Gnome/KDE applications.
Maybe the annoying confusion around the term "window manager" stems
from the fact many so-called WM's provide functionalities that have
little or nothing to do with window management?