On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:16:49 +0200, Gabriel wrote:

> Greetings,
>
> Upon installing the latest drivers from ati, I get an average score of
> 600 FPS.
> is that standard or is it low ?
> Atlhon 1700 +

It also depends on the video card - whether agp or pci, video memory, etc.
That value seems a little low - I get around 500 on my mini-itx 1mhz
system with onboard video.

ray wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:16:49 +0200, Gabriel wrote:
>
>
>>Greetings,
>>
>>Upon installing the latest drivers from ati, I get an average score of
>>600 FPS.
>>is that standard or is it low ?
>>Atlhon 1700 +
>
>
> It also depends on the video card - whether agp or pci, video memory, etc.
> That value seems a little low - I get around 500 on my mini-itx 1mhz
> system with onboard video.
>
ati radeon 9200 on agp port

--
--
email : on se découvre pour m'écrire

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 18:43:30 +0200, Gabriel wrote:
> ray wrote:
>> On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:16:49 +0200, Gabriel wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Greetings,
>>>
>>>Upon installing the latest drivers from ati, I get an average score of
>>>600 FPS.
>>>is that standard or is it low ?
>>>Atlhon 1700 +
>>
>>
>> It also depends on the video card - whether agp or pci, video memory, etc.
>> That value seems a little low - I get around 500 on my mini-itx 1mhz
>> system with onboard video.
>>
> ati radeon 9200 on agp port

At what resolution? I get about a third less at 28bpp than 16 bpp.

Rinaldi
--
"You must realize that the computer has it in for you. The irrefutable
proof of this is that the computer always does what you tell it to do."

Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 18:43:30 +0200, Gabriel wrote:
>
>>ray wrote:
>>
>>>On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:16:49 +0200, Gabriel wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Greetings,
>>>>
>>>>Upon installing the latest drivers from ati, I get an average score of
>>>>600 FPS.
>>>>is that standard or is it low ?
>>>>Atlhon 1700 +
>>>
>>>
>>>It also depends on the video card - whether agp or pci, video memory, etc.
>>>That value seems a little low - I get around 500 on my mini-itx 1mhz
>>>system with onboard video.
>>>
>>
>>ati radeon 9200 on agp port
>
>
> At what resolution? I get about a third less at 28bpp than 16 bpp.
>
> Rinaldi
oups sorry, I was a little quick on the reply button : 1024*768* 32bits

--
--
email : on se découvre pour m'écrire

Here is what dmesg says :

fglrx: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted.
fglrx: module license 'Proprietary. (C) 2002 - ATI Technologies,
Starnberg, GERMANY' taints kernel.
[fglrx] Maximum main memory to use for locked dma buffers: 431 MBytes.
[fglrx] module loaded - fglrx 3.9.0 [May 11 2004] on minor 0
mtrr: 0xd0000000,0x8000000 overlaps existing 0xd0000000,0x1000000
[fglrx:firegl_addmap] *ERROR* mtrr allocation failed (-22)
Fire GL built-in AGP-support
Based on agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 439M
agpgart: Detected a VIA KT266 missing the AGPv2 registers, chip might be
a VIA KT400 or compatible. (VIA flag)
agpgart: Detected a Via Apollo KT400 chipset in AGP v2 compat mode at
0000:00:00.0
agpgart: Detected Via Apollo KT266/KT266A/KT333 chipset
agpgart: AGP aperture is 256M @ 0xe0000000
Power management callback for AGP chipset installed
[fglrx] AGP detected, AgpState = 0x1f000217 (hardware caps of chipset)
AGP: Found 2 AGPv2 devices
AGP: Doing enable for AGPv2
[fglrx] AGP enabled, AgpCommand = 0x1f000314 (selected caps)
[fglrx] free AGP = 256126976
[fglrx] max AGP = 256126976
[fglrx] free LFB = 122683392
[fglrx] max LFB = 122683392
[fglrx] free Inv = 0
[fglrx] max Inv = 0
[fglrx] total Inv = 0
[fglrx] total TIM = 0
[fglrx] total FB = 0
[fglrx] total AGP = 65536

I removed the dri driver in Xfree86-4 FPS goes down to 224.
I put it back -> 550 FPS.

Full specs of machine
AMD Athlon 1700+
512 MB DDR
ATI RADEON 9200 AGP PORT
MB : K7V266A

thx for your time !
--
--
email : on se découvre pour m'écrire