how much does glxgears should give with a radeon 9200 ? - X

This is a discussion on how much does glxgears should give with a radeon 9200 ? - X ; Greetings, Upon installing the latest drivers from ati, I get an average score of 600 FPS. is that standard or is it low ? Atlhon 1700 + -- -- email : on se découvre pour m'écrire...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: how much does glxgears should give with a radeon 9200 ?

  1. how much does glxgears should give with a radeon 9200 ?

    Greetings,

    Upon installing the latest drivers from ati, I get an average score of
    600 FPS.
    is that standard or is it low ?
    Atlhon 1700 +

    --
    --
    email : on se découvre pour m'écrire

  2. Re: how much does glxgears should give with a radeon 9200 ?

    On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:16:49 +0200, Gabriel wrote:

    > Greetings,
    >
    > Upon installing the latest drivers from ati, I get an average score of
    > 600 FPS.
    > is that standard or is it low ?
    > Atlhon 1700 +


    It also depends on the video card - whether agp or pci, video memory, etc.
    That value seems a little low - I get around 500 on my mini-itx 1mhz
    system with onboard video.


  3. Re: how much does glxgears should give with a radeon 9200 ?

    ray wrote:
    > On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:16:49 +0200, Gabriel wrote:
    >
    >
    >>Greetings,
    >>
    >>Upon installing the latest drivers from ati, I get an average score of
    >>600 FPS.
    >>is that standard or is it low ?
    >>Atlhon 1700 +

    >
    >
    > It also depends on the video card - whether agp or pci, video memory, etc.
    > That value seems a little low - I get around 500 on my mini-itx 1mhz
    > system with onboard video.
    >

    ati radeon 9200 on agp port

    --
    --
    email : on se découvre pour m'écrire

  4. Re: how much does glxgears should give with a radeon 9200 ?

    On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 18:43:30 +0200, Gabriel wrote:
    > ray wrote:
    >> On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:16:49 +0200, Gabriel wrote:
    >>
    >>
    >>>Greetings,
    >>>
    >>>Upon installing the latest drivers from ati, I get an average score of
    >>>600 FPS.
    >>>is that standard or is it low ?
    >>>Atlhon 1700 +

    >>
    >>
    >> It also depends on the video card - whether agp or pci, video memory, etc.
    >> That value seems a little low - I get around 500 on my mini-itx 1mhz
    >> system with onboard video.
    >>

    > ati radeon 9200 on agp port


    At what resolution? I get about a third less at 28bpp than 16 bpp.

    Rinaldi
    --
    "You must realize that the computer has it in for you. The irrefutable
    proof of this is that the computer always does what you tell it to do."

  5. Re: how much does glxgears should give with a radeon 9200 ?

    Rinaldi J. Montessi wrote:
    > On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 18:43:30 +0200, Gabriel wrote:
    >
    >>ray wrote:
    >>
    >>>On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:16:49 +0200, Gabriel wrote:
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>>Greetings,
    >>>>
    >>>>Upon installing the latest drivers from ati, I get an average score of
    >>>>600 FPS.
    >>>>is that standard or is it low ?
    >>>>Atlhon 1700 +
    >>>
    >>>
    >>>It also depends on the video card - whether agp or pci, video memory, etc.
    >>>That value seems a little low - I get around 500 on my mini-itx 1mhz
    >>>system with onboard video.
    >>>

    >>
    >>ati radeon 9200 on agp port

    >
    >
    > At what resolution? I get about a third less at 28bpp than 16 bpp.
    >
    > Rinaldi

    oups sorry, I was a little quick on the reply button : 1024*768* 32bits

    --
    --
    email : on se découvre pour m'écrire

  6. Re: how much does glxgears should give with a radeon 9200 ?

    Here is what dmesg says :

    fglrx: no version for "struct_module" found: kernel tainted.
    fglrx: module license 'Proprietary. (C) 2002 - ATI Technologies,
    Starnberg, GERMANY' taints kernel.
    [fglrx] Maximum main memory to use for locked dma buffers: 431 MBytes.
    [fglrx] module loaded - fglrx 3.9.0 [May 11 2004] on minor 0
    mtrr: 0xd0000000,0x8000000 overlaps existing 0xd0000000,0x1000000
    [fglrx:firegl_addmap] *ERROR* mtrr allocation failed (-22)
    Fire GL built-in AGP-support
    Based on agpgart interface v0.99 (c) Jeff Hartmann
    agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 439M
    agpgart: Detected a VIA KT266 missing the AGPv2 registers, chip might be
    a VIA KT400 or compatible. (VIA flag)
    agpgart: Detected a Via Apollo KT400 chipset in AGP v2 compat mode at
    0000:00:00.0
    agpgart: Detected Via Apollo KT266/KT266A/KT333 chipset
    agpgart: AGP aperture is 256M @ 0xe0000000
    Power management callback for AGP chipset installed
    [fglrx] AGP detected, AgpState = 0x1f000217 (hardware caps of chipset)
    AGP: Found 2 AGPv2 devices
    AGP: Doing enable for AGPv2
    [fglrx] AGP enabled, AgpCommand = 0x1f000314 (selected caps)
    [fglrx] free AGP = 256126976
    [fglrx] max AGP = 256126976
    [fglrx] free LFB = 122683392
    [fglrx] max LFB = 122683392
    [fglrx] free Inv = 0
    [fglrx] max Inv = 0
    [fglrx] total Inv = 0
    [fglrx] total TIM = 0
    [fglrx] total FB = 0
    [fglrx] total AGP = 65536

    I removed the dri driver in Xfree86-4 FPS goes down to 224.
    I put it back -> 550 FPS.

    Full specs of machine
    AMD Athlon 1700+
    512 MB DDR
    ATI RADEON 9200 AGP PORT
    MB : K7V266A

    thx for your time !
    --
    --
    email : on se découvre pour m'écrire

+ Reply to Thread