Voip Wireless Wikipedia [ VWW '08 ] - Wireless

This is a discussion on Voip Wireless Wikipedia [ VWW '08 ] - Wireless ; It's collected from many sources to one place for your better learning and understanding this breaking technology.I hope that ll help you. Opinions are Welcome!! We are in same business. http://www.freewebs.com/voipformula...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Voip Wireless Wikipedia [ VWW '08 ]

  1. Voip Wireless Wikipedia [ VWW '08 ]

    It's collected from many sources to one place for your better learning
    and understanding this breaking technology.I hope that ll help you.
    Opinions are Welcome!! We are in same business.

    http://www.freewebs.com/voipformula

  2. Re: Voip Wireless Wikipedia [ VWW '08 ]

    jonbonmike@gmail.com wrote:
    > It's collected from many sources




    Reported.

    From: "jonbonmike@gmail.com"
    Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.networking.wireless
    Subject: Voip Wireless Wikipedia [ VWW '08 ]
    Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:33:14 -0800 (PST)
    Organization: http://groups.google.com
    Lines: 5
    Message-ID:

    NNTP-Posting-Host: 195.229.242.154
    Mime-Version: 1.0
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Trace: posting.google.com 1201321994 12378 127.0.0.1 (26 Jan 2008 04:33:14
    GMT)
    X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
    NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 04:33:14 +0000 (UTC)
    Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
    Injection-Info: e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=195.229.242.154;
    posting-account=cqvobgoAAACRunTxLZFl3_OKWAoPg6ar
    User-Agent: G2/1.0
    X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
    rv:1.8.1.11)
    Gecko/20071127 Firefox/2.0.0.11,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
    Path:
    TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTFEEDS02.phx.gbl!msrtra ns!msrn-in!newshub.sdsu.edu!postnews.google.com!e10g2000pr f.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
    Xref: TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl
    microsoft.public.windows.networking.wireless:42803






+ Reply to Thread