|
#1
| |||
| |||
| them? There is a way for Linux [1] but I don't know of any for Windows. The problem is at about 760 MB and I have only one Gigabyte, a solution that simply disables all memory higher than this point would be okay. -Erik [1] -- hackerkey://v4sw5hw2ln3pr5ck0ma2u7LwXm4l7Gi2e2t4b7Ken4/7a16s0r1p-5.62/-6.56g5OR |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
| According to my notes there is a Boot.ini switch: /maxmem=nn nn = maximum memory in MB that WinNT will use It works with WinNT; I have not tried it with WinXP Erik Hahn wrote: > > Is there any way to work around bad memory spots in Windows by not using > them? There is a way for Linux [1] but I don't know of any for Windows. > > The problem is at about 760 MB and I have only one Gigabyte, a solution > that simply disables all memory higher than this point would be okay. > > -Erik > > [1] > > -- > hackerkey://v4sw5hw2ln3pr5ck0ma2u7LwXm4l7Gi2e2t4b7Ken4/7a16s0r1p-5.62/-6.56g5OR -- Mike Walsh |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
| Mike Walsh wrote: > > According to my notes there is a Boot.ini switch: > /maxmem=nn nn = maximum memory in MB that WinNT will use > It works with WinNT; I have not tried it with WinXP It works on WinXP Home SP3 with 512 MB memory using /maxmem=450 > > Erik Hahn wrote: > > > > Is there any way to work around bad memory spots in Windows by not using > > them? There is a way for Linux [1] but I don't know of any for Windows. > > > > The problem is at about 760 MB and I have only one Gigabyte, a solution > > that simply disables all memory higher than this point would be okay. > > > > -Erik -- Mike Walsh |
![]() |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Tools | |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| [News] [Rival] Windows Vista Sales + Windows Vista Upgrades = Windows XP | unix | Linux | 0 | 04-14-2008 03:38 AM |
| =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?2.6.24-rc3-mm1_--_arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c:591:_error:_?= =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?=91TLB=5FFLUSH=5FALL=92_undeclared_?= =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?(first_use_in_this_function)?= | unix | Kernel | 2 | 11-27-2007 05:10 PM |
| =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?manual_page_'ack_to_Inbox_Arch?= =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?iveReport_SpamDelete_More_Acti?= =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?ons_1_of_584_Older_=9B_manual_pa?= =?WINDOWS-1252?Q?ge_'man_2_fork'_wrt_file_locks?= | unix | Kernel | 1 | 11-19-2007 02:30 PM |
| =?windows-1251?B?0OXj6PHy8OD26P8g7vT0+O7w7fv1IOru7O/g7ejpIOgg4O3u7ejs7fv1?= =?windows-1251?B?IPH35fLu4iAvLy/iICDs5fDzICDoICDt6Pfl7CAg7eUg5+Dq8PvyLiAg?= =?windows-1251?B?x+Tl8fwgIPHu4vHl7CAg?= | unix | Debian | 0 | 10-06-2007 05:08 PM |
| Does every windows which shows itself while working on any Windows O.S ( lets say Windows 2k) a registered one? | unix | Programmer | 0 | 10-04-2007 06:12 PM |
All times are GMT. The time now is 08:19 AM.




