Accessing NFS (using SFU) from NT service - Windows NT

This is a discussion on Accessing NFS (using SFU) from NT service - Windows NT ; Hi, I have a windows 2000 server that tries to access a solaris server NFS directories. It works fine using the SFU package. I can mount the network path and view the files in explorer. I can even write to ...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: Accessing NFS (using SFU) from NT service

  1. Accessing NFS (using SFU) from NT service

    Hi,

    I have a windows 2000 server that tries to access a solaris server NFS
    directories.
    It works fine using the SFU package. I can mount the network path and
    view the files in explorer. I can even write to the network drive.

    Problem:
    When I try to access the mounted drive (or the actual network url)
    from my NT service I get the following error: "Logon failure: unknown
    user name or bad password"
    I have tried configuring the service security or the local account
    security but it didn't help.

    Any clue?

    Regards,
    Eyal Bekerman

  2. Re: Accessing NFS (using SFU) from NT service

    For security reasons the NT system account does not have access to network
    resources (as per logged on user).

    FR
    --
    There is nothing more frightening than ignorance in action. - Goethe

    "Eyal Bekerman" wrote in message
    news:f8f892a4.0307090407.23dfeddd@posting.google.c om...
    > Hi,
    >
    > I have a windows 2000 server that tries to access a solaris server NFS
    > directories.
    > It works fine using the SFU package. I can mount the network path and
    > view the files in explorer. I can even write to the network drive.
    >
    > Problem:
    > When I try to access the mounted drive (or the actual network url)
    > from my NT service I get the following error: "Logon failure: unknown
    > user name or bad password"
    > I have tried configuring the service security or the local account
    > security but it didn't help.
    >
    > Any clue?
    >
    > Regards,
    > Eyal Bekerman




+ Reply to Thread