Not a direct answer, just a few links in case you didn't find them already:
*
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/we...attcorner.html
* http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/j-acegi1/
HTH.
This is a discussion on Acegi on Websphere? - Websphere ; I have some developers asking to use ACEGI (also known as the Spring Security Framework). Just wondering if anyone out there has any experiences with running ACEGI on Websphere (good bad or indifferent). Personally, I get an extreme case of ...
I have some developers asking to use ACEGI (also known as the Spring Security Framework).
Just wondering if anyone out there has any experiences with running ACEGI on Websphere (good bad or indifferent).
Personally, I get an extreme case of the willies about farming application security out to some random third-party open source package. I'm willing to be persuaded otherwise, but I haven't really seen much on the topic of integrating ACEGI with Websphere, and I've got a lot of concerns about, well, every aspect of it -- support, maintainibility, integration with future releases, etc, etc.
So, is anybody out there using ACEGI on Websphere?
Thanks,
Tom
Not a direct answer, just a few links in case you didn't find them already:
*
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/we...attcorner.html
* http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/library/j-acegi1/
HTH.
tvalesky@patriot.net wrote:
> I have some developers asking to use ACEGI (also known as the Spring Security Framework).
>
> Just wondering if anyone out there has any experiences with running ACEGI on Websphere (good bad or indifferent).
>
> Personally, I get an extreme case of the willies about farming application security out to some random third-party open source package. I'm willing to be persuaded otherwise, but I haven't really seen much on the topic of integrating ACEGI with Websphere, and I've got a lot of concerns about, well, every aspect of it -- support, maintainibility, integration with future releases, etc, etc.
>
> So, is anybody out there using ACEGI on Websphere?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tom
I would absolutely not recommend using ACEGI with WAS. It doesn't
leverage any JEE standard capabilties, or WebSphere provided security
features, instead it provides alternative implementations.
A simpler solution for fine-grained authorization is described here:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/we...attcorner.html
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/we...attcorner.html
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/we...attcorner.html
This will work with standard WebSphere authentication.
On Mar 21, 12:14*pm, tvale...@patriot.net wrote:
> I have some developers asking to use ACEGI (also known as the Spring Security Framework).
>
> Just wondering if anyone out there has any experiences with running ACEGI on Websphere (good bad or indifferent).
>
> Personally, I get an extreme case of the willies about farming applicationsecurity out to some random third-party open source package. I'm willing tobe persuaded otherwise, but I haven't really seen much on the topic of integrating ACEGI with Websphere, and I've got a lot of concerns about, well, every aspect of it -- support, maintainibility, integration with future releases, etc, etc.
>
> So, is anybody out there using ACEGI on Websphere?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tom
It's a Bad Experience , I would prefer not to hang on with acegi , it
would be very very difficult to extend the framework or sometime if
you want to unplugged it's
really cumbersome.
None of the links work.
g_kollengode@yahoo.com wrote:
> None of the links work.
They work just fine for me.
There's a space in the link...when you click on the link it gets translated to a '%20'. Just remove the '%20' and reload the link.
Ken
I highly recommend you check out Spring Security 2.0, which just went
final a few days back. They introduced a preauthentication concept
that can fully integrate with standard Java EE security, if that's a
big concern of yours.
On Mar 26, 3:06 pm, hsai...@gmail.com wrote:
> It's a Bad Experience , I would prefer not to hang on with acegi , it
> would be very very difficult to extend the framework or sometime if
> you want to unplugged it's
> really cumbersome.