On Jan 30, 12:55 am, "kiran s" wrote:
> Hi,
> I am developing END driver for CS8900a controller for a
> standalone vxworks image.
> IpAttach is working but when i call isAddrSet then it is
> returning the error 0x6.
> DEFAULT_BOOT_LINE IS
> "89a(0,0)host:/usr/wpwr/target/config/template/vxWorks " \
> "h=90.0.0.3 e=90.0.0.50:FFFFFF00 u=username tn=targetname o="
>
> I am calling ifAddrSet( "89a0" , "90.0.0.50")
>
> What could be the problem.
>

My guess is that you're confusing ifLib by naming your device with
leading digits.
Try naming it "cs" and see if you have better luck.

GV

On 30 Jan 2007, kiransnghc@gmail.com wrote:

> I am developing END driver for CS8900a controller for a
> standalone vxworks image.

Um, I hope you don't mean what you said.

"http://www.cirrus.com/en/support/drivers/ethernet/OS51.html"
"http://www.cirrus.com/en/support/drivers/ethernet/OS60.html"

Hopefully you used these as a base...

fwiw,
Bill Pringlemeir.

--
Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste
good with ketchup.

vxWorks FAQ, "http://www.xs4all.nl/~borkhuis/vxworks/vxworks.html"

Bill Pringlemeir wrote:
> On 30 Jan 2007, kiransnghc@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> I am developing END driver for CS8900a controller for a
>> standalone vxworks image.
>
> Um, I hope you don't mean what you said.
>
> "http://www.cirrus.com/en/support/drivers/ethernet/OS51.html"
> "http://www.cirrus.com/en/support/drivers/ethernet/OS60.html"
>
> Hopefully you used these as a base...
>
> fwiw,
> Bill Pringlemeir.
>

Umm...Hopefully he does not use those as a base

/* Permission is hereby granted to licensees of pSOS+ to use or */
/* abstract the following computer program for the sole purpose of */
/* implementing their pSOS+ based software products. No other */
/* rights to reproduce, use or disseminate this computer program, */
/* whether in part or in whole, are granted.

> Bill Pringlemeir wrote:

>> "http://www.cirrus.com/en/support/drivers/ethernet/OS51.html"
>> "http://www.cirrus.com/en/support/drivers/ethernet/OS60.html"
>> Hopefully you used these as a base...

On 30 Jan 2007, jeff@thecreems.com wrote:

> Umm...Hopefully he does not use those as a base

> /* Permission is hereby granted to licensees of pSOS+ to use or */
> /* abstract the following computer program for the sole purpose of
> */ /* implementing their pSOS+ based software products. No other */
> /* rights to reproduce, use or disseminate this computer program, */
> /* whether in part or in whole, are granted.

That is only for the pSOS code, not the vxWorks modules. Also, pSOS
is now owned by WRS.

--
I find this continuous feedback and interplay between pure mathematics
and theoretical physics most fascinating. - Marco

vxWorks FAQ, "http://www.xs4all.nl/~borkhuis/vxworks/vxworks.html"