This is a discussion on Re: OVMS Integrity BASIC LTU Getting only 1 user at cost of $2400.00??? - VMS ; VAXman-@SendSpamHere.ORG wrote on 11/07/2008 04:32:31 PM: > In article , JF Mezei > writes: > >John Reagan wrote: > > > >> I've been staying out of the discussion since I don't even > understand them. > >> That part ...
VAXman-@SendSpamHere.ORG wrote on 11/07/2008 04:32:31 PM:
> In article <firstname.lastname@example.org>, JF Mezei
> >John Reagan wrote:
> >> I've been staying out of the discussion since I don't even
> understand them.
> >> That part of the productizing of the compilers is above my pay
> grade as they
> >> say.
> >But Shirley, you guys could add a couple of IF statements in your
> >compilers to check the status of the licence check call and exit
> >gracefully when it is not good ?
> >And a better thing would be to put the licence check in a loop with a
> >second timer. If the licence is already "in use", wait 10 seconds and
> >try again. This way, as soon as the other compile is done, this one can
> >begin. (this loop could be controlled though some logical name whose
> >value would be the maximum amount of time to wait for licence to become
> Polling? How unixy.
...and don't call him "Shirley!"
> VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker
> ... pejorative statements of opinion are entitled to constitutional
> no matter how extreme, vituperous, or vigorously expressed they may be.
> Copr. 2008 Brian Schenkenberger. Publication of _this_ usenet article
> of usenet _must_ include its contents in its entirety including
> notice, disclaimer and quotations.