MX list revival - VMS

This is a discussion on MX list revival - VMS ; We have revived the mailing list just send a SUBSCRIBE to mx-list-request at our domain, HELP for list of commands -- PL/I for OpenVMS www.kednos.com...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: MX list revival

  1. MX list revival

    We have revived the mailing list just send a SUBSCRIBE to
    mx-list-request at our domain, HELP for list of
    commands

    --
    PL/I for OpenVMS
    www.kednos.com

  2. Re: MX list revival

    In article , "Tom Linden" writes:
    >We have revived the mailing list just send a SUBSCRIBE to
    >mx-list-request at our domain, HELP for list of
    >commands


    I'm getting:

    Final-Recipient: rfc822;MX-LIST-REQUEST{atsign}KEDNOS{dot}COM
    Action: failed
    Status: 5.7.1 (Delivery not authorized, message refused)


    --
    VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)COM

    .... pejorative statements of opinion are entitled to constitutional protection
    no matter how extreme, vituperous, or vigorously expressed they may be. (NJSC)

    Copr. 2008 Brian Schenkenberger. Publication of _this_ usenet article outside
    of usenet _must_ include its contents in its entirety including this copyright
    notice, disclaimer and quotations.

  3. Re: MX list revival

    VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote:
    > In article , "Tom Linden" writes:
    >> We have revived the mailing list just send a SUBSCRIBE to
    >> mx-list-request at our domain, HELP for list of
    >> commands

    >
    > I'm getting:
    >
    > Final-Recipient: rfc822;MX-LIST-REQUEST{atsign}KEDNOS{dot}COM
    > Action: failed
    > Status: 5.7.1 (Delivery not authorized, message refused)
    >


    You were "detected" by the anti-SPAM software :-)

    Please try again.

    Tim.

  4. Re: MX list revival

    Tom Linden wrote:
    > We have revived the mailing list just send a SUBSCRIBE to
    > mx-list-request at our domain, HELP for list of
    > commands
    >


    There is also a webpage with software downloads, HTML
    documentation and archives of the previous MX-List
    incarnations on the way.

    Tim.

  5. Re: MX list revival

    In article , "Tim E. Sneddon" writes:
    >VAXman- @SendSpamHere.ORG wrote:
    >> In article , "Tom Linden" writes:
    >>> We have revived the mailing list just send a SUBSCRIBE to
    >>> mx-list-request at our domain, HELP for list of
    >>> commands

    >>
    >> I'm getting:
    >>
    >> Final-Recipient: rfc822;MX-LIST-REQUEST{atsign}KEDNOS{dot}COM
    >> Action: failed
    >> Status: 5.7.1 (Delivery not authorized, message refused)
    >>

    >
    >You were "detected" by the anti-SPAM software :-)
    >
    >Please try again.


    I did... SOS.


    --
    VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)COM

    .... pejorative statements of opinion are entitled to constitutional protection
    no matter how extreme, vituperous, or vigorously expressed they may be. (NJSC)

    Copr. 2008 Brian Schenkenberger. Publication of _this_ usenet article outside
    of usenet _must_ include its contents in its entirety including this copyright
    notice, disclaimer and quotations.

  6. Re: MX list revival

    Tom Linden vaguely mentioned on 9-10-2008 19:09:
    > We have revived the mailing list just send a SUBSCRIBE to
    > mx-list-request at our domain, HELP for list of
    > commands


    I'm getting:

    554 5.7.1 Message rejected due to header contents. (state 18).

    ----- Original message -----

    Received: by 10.67.115.5 with SMTP id s5mr3782988ugm.63.1223578641833;
    Thu, 09 Oct 2008 11:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
    Return-Path:
    Received: from ?127.0.0.1? (ip3e839151.speed.planet.nl [62.131.145.81])
    by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id
    r38sm1623137ugc.56.2008.10.09.11.57.20
    (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
    Thu, 09 Oct 2008 11:57:21 -0700 (PDT)
    Message-ID: <48EE53FC.3040502@planet.nl>
    Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:57:00 +0200
    Reply-To: w6.boerhout@planet.nl
    User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
    MIME-Version: 1.0
    To: mx-list-request@kednos.com
    Subject: HELP
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    From: Wilm Boerhout

    HELP

  7. Re: MX list revival

    On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:48:27 -0700, VAXman- wrote:

    Brian,

    9-OCT-2008 14:14:31.12: MX SMTP server: rejected message from
    sent by [64.253.47.113] due to RFC822 header rule
    [Received: from *warning*] [rule id 804]

    I have removed this rule, but it has been very effective in eliminating
    spam, I wonder why
    you got caught?

    Tom

    --
    PL/I for OpenVMS
    www.kednos.com

  8. Re: MX list revival

    On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 06:10:37 -0700, Tom Linden wrote:

    > On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:48:27 -0700, VAXman- wrote:
    >
    > Brian,
    >
    > 9-OCT-2008 14:14:31.12: MX SMTP server: rejected message from
    > sent by [64.253.47.113] due to RFC822 header rule
    > [Received: from *warning*] [rule id 804]
    >
    > I have removed this rule, but it has been very effective in eliminating
    > spam, I wonder why
    > you got caught?
    >
    > Tom
    >


    Here is an example of the type of spam I was rejecting, which is now back.

    Return-Path:
    Received: from hotkeyserver.net (206.106.11.53) by FREJA.KEDNOS.COM (MX
    V5.4
    An1f) with SMTP (warning type 0007) for ;
    Fri, 10 Oct 2008 06:56:19 -0700

    I wonder what type 0007 is?

    BTW, in experimenting we found that one of the 4 nodes running MX with
    loadbroker
    was rejecting but others not. There is a common config file for all, so
    this is a
    mystery.


    --
    PL/I for OpenVMS
    www.kednos.com

  9. Re: MX list revival

    In article , "Tom Linden" writes:
    >On Thu, 09 Oct 2008 17:48:27 -0700, VAXman- wrote:
    >
    >Brian,
    >
    > 9-OCT-2008 14:14:31.12: MX SMTP server: rejected message from
    > sent by [64.253.47.113] due to RFC822 header rule
    >[Received: from *warning*] [rule id 804]
    >
    >I have removed this rule, but it has been very effective in eliminating
    >spam, I wonder why
    >you got caught?


    *warning* The MX server saw me coming!

    I'm signed up now. Thanks. No idea why one MX% mailer would reject
    another though.

    --
    VAXman- A Bored Certified VMS Kernel Mode Hacker VAXman(at)TMESIS(dot)COM

    .... pejorative statements of opinion are entitled to constitutional protection
    no matter how extreme, vituperous, or vigorously expressed they may be. (NJSC)

    Copr. 2008 Brian Schenkenberger. Publication of _this_ usenet article outside
    of usenet _must_ include its contents in its entirety including this copyright
    notice, disclaimer and quotations.

  10. Re: MX list revival

    Wilm Boerhout vaguely mentioned on 10-10-2008 7:04:
    > Tom Linden vaguely mentioned on 9-10-2008 19:09:
    >> We have revived the mailing list just send a SUBSCRIBE to
    >> mx-list-request at our domain, HELP for list of
    >> commands

    >
    > I'm getting:
    >
    > 554 5.7.1 Message rejected due to header contents. (state 18).
    >

    [snipped]

    This issue is resolved.

    Thanks Tim!

  11. Re: MX list revival

    Tim E. Sneddon wrote:
    > Tom Linden wrote:
    >> We have revived the mailing list just send a SUBSCRIBE to
    >> mx-list-request at our domain, HELP for list of
    >> commands
    >>

    >
    > There is also a webpage with software downloads, HTML
    > documentation and archives of the previous MX-List
    > incarnations on the way.
    >


    It's finally up!

    You can see the MX webpage at:

    http://www.kednos.com/kednos/Resources/MX

    Tim.

    PS. For all those MMK users out there...keep your eyes peeled
    as there is a new version in the works that offers more
    MMS compatability.

+ Reply to Thread