In article ,
Stan Barr wrote:
>On 13 Sep 2008 13:18:57 GMT, Bill Gunshannon wrote:
>[RE Ultrix-11]
>>Well, maybe they were mistaken, but according to PUPS (several yearfs ago)
>>Ultrix-11 was declared as covered by the Caldera License. Maybe they
>>spoke with the DEC/Compaq/HP whoever was in charge at the time and were
>>told they could do this. Probably worth going back and asking Warren
>>for a clarification.

>The Caldera license I have says:
>32-bit 32V UNIX
>16 bit UNIX Versions 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
>No mention of Ultrix.
>Stan Barr t-bone .at. dial .dot. pipex .dot. com
>The future was never like this!

That's my hard and soft copy as well.


Be comforted that in the face of all erridity and disallusionment, and
despite the changing fortunes of time, there is always a big future in
computer maintainance. --Deteriorata (pechter-at-gmail-dot-com)