| Unix Content | Register | FAQ | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
#1
|
| DaveG > On Aug 22, 10:56 am, DaveG > > On Aug 22, 8:41 am, "P. Sture" > > > > > > > > > > > > > In article > > > koeh...@eisner.nospam.encompasserve.org (Bob Koehler) wrote: > > > > > > In article <00A7E75B.E1A3D...@SendSpamHere.ORG>, VAXman- > @SendSpamHere.ORG > > > > writes: > > > > > FWIW, reading the patch description text (Yes, with my specson), there > > > > > is nothing to indicate the severity of or need for applying > this patch! > > > > > I'd wager that there are sites that will NEVER install this > patch unless > > > > > they see some buffer overflow in SMG. Unless this patch is > listed as a > > > > > SECURITY patch, people not following what has been going on > here for the > > > > > better part of a week will not install it. > > > > > > Yes. the rating is INSTAL_1, but it should be a MUP! > > > > > I second that 100%! > > > > > -- > > > Paul Sture > > > > FWIW, I sent Ann Mc... a comment regarding the MUP Vs Install 1 > > thingie.- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > Got a reply. Was told the SMGRTL patch will become a MUP. Will also > be included as such in the next release of OpenVMS. > That's the next release of OpenVMS VAX, right 8-) ? > They listened. > |