Conclude, you say the random port issue corrected from named v572 p010 to p011 does not exist on the 9.4.2-p1 used in v582.
Correct?

-----Original Message-----
From: Geoff Bryant [mailto:bryant@process.com]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 3:56 PM
To: info-tcpware@process.com
Cc: bryant@process.com
Subject: Re: TCPware ECO kit available: NAMED_V572P011

The 5.8-2 kit (NAMED_V582P010) was released earlier.

info-tcpware@process.com wrote:
>
>In article <00A7D9CC.CE4C4666.43@triton.process.com>, bryant@PROCESS.COM writes:
>>TCPware ECO kit announcement
>>
>>The following ECO kit is now available for TCPware:
>>
>> ECO: NAMED_V572P011
>> Description: Implement latest ISC security patch
>> Release date: 4-AUG-2008
>> Ranking: 0
>> Max ranking: 0
>> Versions: 5.7-2
>>
>> ftp://ftp.process.com/support/57_2/named_v572p011.zip
>
>Is there any ECO for BIND9/TCPware V5.8-2 (required) ?
>
>TIA
>
>--
>Peter "EPLAN" LANGSTÖGER
>Network and OpenVMS system specialist
>E-mail Peter@LANGSTOeGER.at
>A-1030 VIENNA AUSTRIA I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist
>

In article <01MY889E44N28WW3E3@alcor.process.com>, Geoff Bryant writes:
>The 5.8-2 kit (NAMED_V582P010) was released earlier.

Ooops. Right you are.
My (primary) newsserver had no posting at all in July (and so I missed
this NAMED and also the FTP ECO) but my 2nd had it then...

Thanks for the clarification

--
Peter "EPLAN" LANGSTÖGER
Network and OpenVMS system specialist
E-mail Peter@LANGSTOeGER.at
A-1030 VIENNA AUSTRIA I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist