MONITOR with different architectures - VMS

This is a discussion on MONITOR with different architectures - VMS ; "Robert Deininger" wrote in message news:rdeininger-127F66.09304031082007@032-478-847.area7.spcsdns.net... > In article , > helbig@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to > reply) wrote: > >> In article , >> Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) writes: >> ....snip... >> > 2. The patch does not have some ...

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 21 to 22 of 22

Thread: MONITOR with different architectures

  1. Re: MONITOR with different architectures


    "Robert Deininger" wrote in message
    news:rdeininger-127F66.09304031082007@032-478-847.area7.spcsdns.net...
    > In article ,
    > helbig@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to
    > reply) wrote:
    >
    >> In article <3QGx2DOob4Cv@eisner.encompasserve.org>,
    >> Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) writes:
    >>

    ....snip...
    >> > 2. The patch does not have some theoretical drawback known
    >> > through methods other than testing

    >>
    >> Whatever happened to DEC quality?

    >
    > Huh? If DEC had known about an incompatibility, do you think they'd
    > have shipped it anyway?
    >

    ....snip...
    >
    > Disclaimer: parts of this post are pure sarcasm.


    Sarcasm aside , HP did know about the remote MONITOR incompatibility and
    properly documented it in section 4.1.3 of the V8.3 Release Notes.

    -Jeff



  2. RE: MONITOR with different architectures


    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: Jeff Goodwin [mailto:jgoodwin@maine.rrr-r.com]
    > Sent: August 31, 2007 10:02 AM
    > To: Info-VAX@Mvb.Saic.Com
    > Subject: Re: MONITOR with different architectures
    >
    >
    > "Robert Deininger" wrote in message
    > news:rdeininger-127F66.09304031082007@032-478-847.area7.spcsdns.net...
    > > In article ,
    > > helbig@astro.multiCLOTHESvax.de (Phillip Helbig---remove CLOTHES to
    > > reply) wrote:
    > >
    > >> In article <3QGx2DOob4Cv@eisner.encompasserve.org>,
    > >> Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen) writes:
    > >>

    > ...snip...
    > >> > 2. The patch does not have some theoretical drawback known
    > >> > through methods other than testing
    > >>
    > >> Whatever happened to DEC quality?

    > >
    > > Huh? If DEC had known about an incompatibility, do you think they'd
    > > have shipped it anyway?
    > >

    > ...snip...
    > >
    > > Disclaimer: parts of this post are pure sarcasm.

    >
    > Sarcasm aside , HP did know about the remote MONITOR incompatibility
    > and
    > properly documented it in section 4.1.3 of the V8.3 Release Notes.
    >
    > -Jeff
    >


    Jeff,

    Thanks for pointing this out.

    Here is a reference for those that still like to play with black helicopters:
    http://h71000.www7.hp.com/doc/83fina...stemmanagement

    Regards


    Kerry Main
    Senior Consultant
    HP Services Canada
    Voice: 613-592-4660
    Fax: 613-591-4477
    kerryDOTmainAThpDOTcom
    (remove the DOT's and AT)

    OpenVMS - the secure, multi-site OS that just works.





+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2