kernel patch? - VMS

This is a discussion on kernel patch? - VMS ; Is the difference between kernel-update-170_a051 and kernel-update-171_a051 cosmetic or functional? I have already downloaded and applied the 170 version. Do I need to do the same for the 171 version? Thanks! -- - Ken ================================================== =============== Ken Connelly Associate Director, ...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: kernel patch?

  1. kernel patch?

    Is the difference between kernel-update-170_a051 and
    kernel-update-171_a051 cosmetic or functional? I have already
    downloaded and applied the 170 version. Do I need to do the same for
    the 171 version?

    Thanks!

    --
    - Ken
    ================================================== ===============
    Ken Connelly Associate Director, Security and Systems
    ITS Network Services University of Northern Iowa
    email: Ken.Connelly@uni.edu p: (319) 273-5850 f: (319) 273-7373


  2. RE: kernel patch?

    Functional. There was an editing error in 170 that caused the change to
    not be effective.

    -----Original Message-----
    From: Ken Connelly [mailto:Ken.Connelly@uni.edu]
    Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 7:41 AM
    To: MultiNet list
    Subject: kernel patch?

    Is the difference between kernel-update-170_a051 and
    kernel-update-171_a051 cosmetic or functional? I have already
    downloaded and applied the 170 version. Do I need to do the same for
    the 171 version?

    Thanks!

    --
    - Ken
    ================================================== ===============
    Ken Connelly Associate Director, Security and Systems
    ITS Network Services University of Northern Iowa
    email: Ken.Connelly@uni.edu p: (319) 273-5850 f: (319) 273-7373


  3. Re: kernel patch?



    Richard Whalen wrote:
    > Functional. There was an editing error in 170 that caused the change to
    > not be effective.


    I thought that I had posted the announcement, but didn't notice that I never
    saw it come through the list.

    --

    Curtis Williams
    Process Software

  4. Re: kernel patch?

    Thanks, guys!

    -ken

    Curtis Williams wrote:
    >
    >
    > Richard Whalen wrote:
    >> Functional. There was an editing error in 170 that caused the change to
    >> not be effective.

    >
    > I thought that I had posted the announcement, but didn't notice that I
    > never saw it come through the list.
    >
    > --
    >
    > Curtis Williams
    > Process Software


    --
    - Ken
    ================================================== ===============
    Ken Connelly Associate Director, Security and Systems
    ITS Network Services University of Northern Iowa
    email: Ken.Connelly@uni.edu p: (319) 273-5850 f: (319) 273-7373


+ Reply to Thread