This is a discussion on Re: When was what end-of-life'd? - VMS ; On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Eric Smith wrote: > Johnny wrote: >> Actually, the 11/40 FE was also the comm processor for all terminal lines. > > IIRC, a DCxx or DNxx subsystem using an 11/40 (or 11/34) was always ...
On Tue, 11 Jan 2005, Eric Smith wrote:
> Johnny wrote:
>> Actually, the 11/40 FE was also the comm processor for all terminal lines.
> IIRC, a DCxx or DNxx subsystem using an 11/40 (or 11/34) was always used
> for the KL10-based DECSYSTEM-20 terminal lines other than the console.
> RSX20F wasn't really designed for handling lots of terminal lines, while
> the DCxx and DNxx software was. I'd have to check the LCG configuration
> manual to be sure.
Oh, believe me. We have a whole extra cabinet of terminal lines, all
running through the FE on one of our -2060s.
The other -2060 only have the terminal lines that could be fitted in the
normal cabinet, hooked to the FE.
> On the KS10, ISTR the terminal muxes being DZ11s on the Unibus, directly
> controlled by the KS10 CPU.
If it used DZ11, it's a shame, since that is a real hog on CPU.
But I haven't really mucked around inside any KS to know.
The 11/40 FE uses DH11s. So you don't manage to fit more than one (or if
it is two) inside the 11/40 cpu box. After that you need a Unibus
expansion. (The DH11 is a full 9-slot dedicated backplane for 16 lines.)
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: email@example.com || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
To unsubscribe (or subscribe) from (to) this list, send a message to
firstname.lastname@example.org, with the first line of the message
body being "unsubscribe" or "subscribe", respectively (without the quotes).