Guy wrote:
> The issue was the fact that large(r) swap-ins were lower priority than
> small(er) swap-ins.


Sure, but isn't it the compiler pass code that's being swapped? The size
of that is independent of the size of the routine you're trying to
compile, so you'd want to minimize how many routines you have.

Eric

----------
To unsubscribe (or subscribe) from (to) this list, send a message to
info-pdp11-request@village.org, with the first line of the message
body being "unsubscribe" or "subscribe", respectively (without the quotes).