Is there a description of the changes between 4.2 and 4.5 somewhere?
Thanks
Mike
Printable View
Is there a description of the changes between 4.2 and 4.5 somewhere?
Thanks
Mike
Ditto. How are we supposed to know if we should upgrade? Is it really too
much to ask that they put the list of changes/fixes up on the site? I spent
20 minutes going thru the site and couldn't find anything on the changes
from 4.2 to 4.5. 4.2 is working fine so I guess I'll keep it. Seems pretty
shady to me.
--Mark--
"Mike Blake-Knox" <mikebk@intrex.net> wrote in message
news:39ad7a77$1@hronntp01....[color=blue]
>
> Is there a description of the changes between 4.2 and 4.5 somewhere?
>
> Thanks
>
> Mike[/color]
I agree. I also have 4.21 and do not know if there is any reason to spend
the $30.
"Mark Manolio" <mmanolio@drfast.net> wrote in message
news:39b8f88d@hronntp01....[color=blue]
> Ditto. How are we supposed to know if we should upgrade? Is it really[/color]
too[color=blue]
> much to ask that they put the list of changes/fixes up on the site? I[/color]
spent[color=blue]
> 20 minutes going thru the site and couldn't find anything on the changes
> from 4.2 to 4.5. 4.2 is working fine so I guess I'll keep it. Seems[/color]
pretty[color=blue]
> shady to me.
> --Mark--
>
> "Mike Blake-Knox" <mikebk@intrex.net> wrote in message
> news:39ad7a77$1@hronntp01....[color=green]
> >
> > Is there a description of the changes between 4.2 and 4.5 somewhere?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Mike[/color]
>[/color]
4.5 is intended for those of us using Win 2000, not sure what else they've
changed.
I see no point in getting 4.5 until I see support for my tape drive listed
in Win 2000. I'll check again in a few weeks.
Using 4.2.1, I already can back up my drives on my dual boot Win 98/Win 2000
system, just do not get emergency restore in Win 2000, but I have it for Win
98.
--
Please post your response to the newsgroup.
"Mark Manolio" <mmanolio@drfast.net> wrote in message
news:39b8f88d@hronntp01....[color=blue]
> Ditto. How are we supposed to know if we should upgrade? Is it really[/color]
too[color=blue]
> much to ask that they put the list of changes/fixes up on the site? I[/color]
spent[color=blue]
> 20 minutes going thru the site and couldn't find anything on the changes
> from 4.2 to 4.5. 4.2 is working fine so I guess I'll keep it. Seems[/color]
pretty[color=blue]
> shady to me.
> --Mark--
>
> "Mike Blake-Knox" <mikebk@intrex.net> wrote in message
> news:39ad7a77$1@hronntp01....[color=green]
> >
> > Is there a description of the changes between 4.2 and 4.5 somewhere?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Mike[/color]
>[/color]