Agent Accelerator not recognized - v 8.0 build 3316 - Veritas Backup Exec
This is a discussion on Agent Accelerator not recognized - v 8.0 build 3316 - Veritas Backup Exec ; After many permutations and reinstallations, BE still does not recognize the
presence of the agent accelerator on even one remote server. I am not optimistic
that this will ever work for us, having seen the other posts on this board.
...
-
Agent Accelerator not recognized - v 8.0 build 3316
After many permutations and reinstallations, BE still does not recognize the
presence of the agent accelerator on even one remote server. I am not optimistic
that this will ever work for us, having seen the other posts on this board.
Nevertheless, a question: I am using a domain account that belongs to the
domain admin and backup operator groups (to eliminate any possibility that
it won't have rights to do stuff) for all the BE services on the backup server
as well as the agent accelerator service on the remote server. Is there
anything wrong with doing this? Should I be using a different kind of user
to run these services? Also, I take it that there should be only one agent
accelerator service that runs on the remote server, and that I'm not missing
any other needed BE services. Is this correct?
An aside: Why does Veritas seem to think it is acceptible that the push
installation of the agent accelerator seems to fail in a staggering number
of cases (not to mention other problems)?
Thanks for any advice.
Anthony Barone
-
Re: Agent Accelerator not recognized - v 8.0 build 3316
Is the AA running on the remote servers? Use Control Panel/Services to check
it's up and running. Have you re-booted the remote servers after
installation? Did you get a message telling you to?
Ken McNulty
Anthony Barone wrote in message
news:39f9b47f$1@hronntp01....
>
> After many permutations and reinstallations, BE still does not recognize
the
> presence of the agent accelerator on even one remote server. I am not
optimistic
> that this will ever work for us, having seen the other posts on this
board.
> Nevertheless, a question: I am using a domain account that belongs to
the
> domain admin and backup operator groups (to eliminate any possibility that
> it won't have rights to do stuff) for all the BE services on the backup
server
> as well as the agent accelerator service on the remote server. Is there
> anything wrong with doing this? Should I be using a different kind of
user
> to run these services? Also, I take it that there should be only one
agent
> accelerator service that runs on the remote server, and that I'm not
missing
> any other needed BE services. Is this correct?
>
> An aside: Why does Veritas seem to think it is acceptible that the push
> installation of the agent accelerator seems to fail in a staggering number
> of cases (not to mention other problems)?
>
> Thanks for any advice.
> Anthony Barone
-
Re: Agent Accelerator not recognized - v 8.0 build 3316
I had the same problem. Finally, after numerous calls to Veritas, the culprit
turned out to be Services for MacIntosh. Once I removed tht service and
rebooted, it worked.
"Ken McNulty" wrote:
>Is the AA running on the remote servers? Use Control Panel/Services to check
>it's up and running. Have you re-booted the remote servers after
>installation? Did you get a message telling you to?
>
>Ken McNulty
>
>Anthony Barone wrote in message
>news:39f9b47f$1@hronntp01....
>>
>> After many permutations and reinstallations, BE still does not recognize
>the
>> presence of the agent accelerator on even one remote server. I am not
>optimistic
>> that this will ever work for us, having seen the other posts on this
>board.
>> Nevertheless, a question: I am using a domain account that belongs to
>the
>> domain admin and backup operator groups (to eliminate any possibility
that
>> it won't have rights to do stuff) for all the BE services on the backup
>server
>> as well as the agent accelerator service on the remote server. Is there
>> anything wrong with doing this? Should I be using a different kind of
>user
>> to run these services? Also, I take it that there should be only one
>agent
>> accelerator service that runs on the remote server, and that I'm not
>missing
>> any other needed BE services. Is this correct?
>>
>> An aside: Why does Veritas seem to think it is acceptible that the push
>> installation of the agent accelerator seems to fail in a staggering number
>> of cases (not to mention other problems)?
>>
>> Thanks for any advice.
>> Anthony Barone
>
>