Nvidia problems on Ubuntu 8.04 - Ubuntu
This is a discussion on Nvidia problems on Ubuntu 8.04 - Ubuntu ; Ramon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I've tried to install Nvidia graphics card driver (on Ubuntu
> 8.04) by doing the following steps:
>
> [1] sudo apt-get install nvidia-glx-new
> [2] sudo nvidia-xconfig
>
> The following error ...
-
Re: Nvidia problems on Ubuntu 8.04
Ramon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I've tried to install Nvidia graphics card driver (on Ubuntu
> 8.04) by doing the following steps:
>
> [1] sudo apt-get install nvidia-glx-new
> [2] sudo nvidia-xconfig
>
> The following error occurred when I've performed step [2]:
>
> ----------------------------------
> Using X configuration file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf".
>
> VALIDATION ERROR: Data incomplete in file /etc/X11/xorg.conf.
> Device section "Configured Video Device" must have a
> Driver line.
>
> Backed up file '/etc/X11/xorg.conf' as '/etc/X11/xorg.conf.backup'
> New X configuration file written to '/etc/X11/xorg.conf'
> ----------------------------------
>
> I've then restarted the X server (ctrl-alt-Delete
> since I am using KDE) and the monitor suddenly turned off (there was no
> display)!!
>
> Probably, there is no display since my monitor's highest resolution is
> 1024x768 and the graphics card driver is trying to use a higher
> resolution (my graphics card is Nvidia 7300 GT).
>
> Any suggestions?
>
What i've done so far:
[1] sudo apt-get install nvidia-glx-new
[2] sudo nvidia-xconfig
[3] Edited the xorg.conf file, arranges the monitor's frequencies and
added the resolution modeline (obtained via xvidtune).
Part of the xorg.conf file is shown below:
[snip]
Section "Monitor"
Identifier "Monitor0"
VendorName "Unknown"
ModelName "Unknown"
HorizSync 30.0 - 70.0
VertRefresh 50.0 - 130.0
ModeLine "1024x768" 94.50 1024 1096 1200 1376 768
771 775 809 -hsync +vsync
Option "DPMS"
EndSection
[snip]
[4] Restarted the X server ... still NO display (blank screen).
[5] Examined /var/log/Xorg.0.log and tried to extract the errors. The
following is the error that the log file has:
(EE) Failed to load module "type1" (module does not exist, 0)
(EE) NVIDIA(0): Failed to initialize the NVIDIA kernel module! Please ensure
(EE) NVIDIA(0): that there is a supported NVIDIA GPU in this system, and
(EE) NVIDIA(0): that the NVIDIA device files have been created properly.
(EE) NVIDIA(0): Please consult the NVIDIA README for details.
(EE) NVIDIA(0): *** Aborting ***
(EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration.
Any suggestion? Thanks.
--
E-mail address: ramif_47(at)yahoo.co.uk
-
Re: Nvidia problems on Ubuntu 8.04
Trevor Best wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:22:47 +0200, Ramon wrote:
>
>
>> Moog wrote:
>>
> [snip]
>
>> Hi Mong. My monitor is "Vibrant" model no. VM71RDA-E01 (Horizontal
>> 30Khz-70Khz Vertical 50Hz-130Hz). Any suggestions?
>>
>
> Mong. ROFLMAO :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-) :-)
Isn't that short for "mongrel"?
--
John
No Microsoft, Apple, AT&T, Intel, Novell, Trend Micro, nor Ford products were used in the preparation or transmission of this message.
The EULA sounds like it was written by a team of lawyers who want to tell me what I can't do. The GPL sounds like it was written by a human being, who wants me to know what I can do.
-
Re: Nvidia problems on Ubuntu 8.04
in 65629 20080730 130305 Ignoramus19611 wrote:
>On 2008-07-30, Bob Martin wrote:
>> in 65543 20080729 220709 Patrick Phillips wrote:
>>>On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:26:42 +0200
>>>Ramon wrote:
>>>
>>>> So my question is, if this driver is junk, is there any Nvidia
>>>> driver to enable the 3-D acceleration?
>>>
>>>It works fine, and that's first time I've seen anyone post otherwise
>>>and suspect that was a opinion.
>>
>> I've been unable to get my 7300GT working on the last 3 versions of Ubuntu.
>
>Are you saying that it did not work with any driver at all? Or that it
>does not work with the "closed source driver"?
Sorry, that was sloppy of me, I was in a hurry. I meant that all my attempts to
get it working with other than "nv" have failed dismally, and judging by what I
read on the web I am far from the only one.
IOW - It's fine with nv
-
Re: Nvidia problems on Ubuntu 8.04
On 2008-07-31, Bob Martin wrote:
> in 65629 20080730 130305 Ignoramus19611 wrote:
>>On 2008-07-30, Bob Martin wrote:
>>> in 65543 20080729 220709 Patrick Phillips wrote:
>>>>On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:26:42 +0200
>>>>Ramon wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> So my question is, if this driver is junk, is there any Nvidia
>>>>> driver to enable the 3-D acceleration?
>>>>
>>>>It works fine, and that's first time I've seen anyone post otherwise
>>>>and suspect that was a opinion.
>>>
>>> I've been unable to get my 7300GT working on the last 3 versions of Ubuntu.
>>
>>Are you saying that it did not work with any driver at all? Or that it
>>does not work with the "closed source driver"?
>
> Sorry, that was sloppy of me, I was in a hurry. I meant that all my attempts to
> get it working with other than "nv" have failed dismally, and judging by what I
> read on the web I am far from the only one.
> IOW - It's fine with nv
I am in the same boat, the 'nv' driver works every time and the
"NVidia closed source driver" gives me trouble. I do not feel that I
am missing much by not using that driver. All Linux kernel people, of
which I am obviously not one, hate those closed source driver.
--
Due to extreme spam originating from Google Groups, and their inattention
to spammers, I and many others block all articles originating
from Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by
more readers you will need to find a different means of
posting on Usenet.
http://improve-usenet.org/
-
Re: Nvidia problems on Ubuntu 8.04
On 2008-07-31, Ignoramus25244 hit the keyboard and wrote:
> On 2008-07-31, Bob Martin wrote:
>> in 65629 20080730 130305 Ignoramus19611 wrote:
>>>On 2008-07-30, Bob Martin wrote:
>>>> in 65543 20080729 220709 Patrick Phillips wrote:
>>>>>On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:26:42 +0200
>>>>>Ramon wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> So my question is, if this driver is junk, is there any Nvidia
>>>>>> driver to enable the 3-D acceleration?
>>>>>
>>>>>It works fine, and that's first time I've seen anyone post otherwise
>>>>>and suspect that was a opinion.
>>>>
>>>> I've been unable to get my 7300GT working on the last 3 versions of Ubuntu.
>>>
>>>Are you saying that it did not work with any driver at all? Or that it
>>>does not work with the "closed source driver"?
>>
>> Sorry, that was sloppy of me, I was in a hurry. I meant that all my attempts to
>> get it working with other than "nv" have failed dismally, and judging by what I
>> read on the web I am far from the only one.
>> IOW - It's fine with nv
>
> I am in the same boat, the 'nv' driver works every time and the
> "NVidia closed source driver" gives me trouble. I do not feel that I
> am missing much by not using that driver. All Linux kernel people, of
> which I am obviously not one, hate those closed source driver.
Well I tried to install the nvidia driver using their
installer, but after it *pretends* to install the driver, at
the next reboot X can't load, and it complains that no
"nvidia-driver" could be found.
Right now I'm using a nvidia driver I could install via
"hardware-driver". I'm sure though when I restart the new
kernel I will have to start at scratch.
Here on this 64bit box I can't get dpkg-reconfigure to work,
that it would allow me to setup the card, monitor etc.etc.
(no -plow -phigh)
>
Dragomir Kollaric
--
This signature is licensed under the GPL and may be
freely distributed as long as a copy of the GPL is included... :-)
-
Re: Nvidia problems on Ubuntu 8.04
On 2008-07-31, Dragomir Kollaric wrote:
> On 2008-07-31, Ignoramus25244 hit the keyboard and wrote:
>> On 2008-07-31, Bob Martin wrote:
>>> in 65629 20080730 130305 Ignoramus19611 wrote:
>>>>On 2008-07-30, Bob Martin wrote:
>>>>> in 65543 20080729 220709 Patrick Phillips wrote:
>>>>>>On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 22:26:42 +0200
>>>>>>Ramon wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So my question is, if this driver is junk, is there any Nvidia
>>>>>>> driver to enable the 3-D acceleration?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It works fine, and that's first time I've seen anyone post otherwise
>>>>>>and suspect that was a opinion.
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been unable to get my 7300GT working on the last 3 versions of Ubuntu.
>>>>
>>>>Are you saying that it did not work with any driver at all? Or that it
>>>>does not work with the "closed source driver"?
>>>
>>> Sorry, that was sloppy of me, I was in a hurry. I meant that all my attempts to
>>> get it working with other than "nv" have failed dismally, and judging by what I
>>> read on the web I am far from the only one.
>>> IOW - It's fine with nv
>>
>> I am in the same boat, the 'nv' driver works every time and the
>> "NVidia closed source driver" gives me trouble. I do not feel that I
>> am missing much by not using that driver. All Linux kernel people, of
>> which I am obviously not one, hate those closed source driver.
>
> Well I tried to install the nvidia driver using their
> installer, but after it *pretends* to install the driver, at
> the next reboot X can't load, and it complains that no
> "nvidia-driver" could be found.
>
> Right now I'm using a nvidia driver I could install via
> "hardware-driver". I'm sure though when I restart the new
> kernel I will have to start at scratch.
>
> Here on this 64bit box I can't get dpkg-reconfigure to work,
> that it would allow me to setup the card, monitor etc.etc.
> (no -plow -phigh)
>
Dragomir, maybe I missed something, but have you tried removing the
nvidia closed source driver, completely, and using the regular system
nv driver?
Can you try doing that if you have not done so already?
That is
1) Remove whatever nvidia closed driver you installed. Make really
sure you removed it
2) reboot
3) run dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
--
Due to extreme spam originating from Google Groups, and their inattention
to spammers, I and many others block all articles originating
from Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by
more readers you will need to find a different means of
posting on Usenet.
http://improve-usenet.org/
-
Re: Nvidia problems on Ubuntu 8.04
On 2008-07-31, Ignoramus25244 hit the keyboard and wrote:
> Dragomir, maybe I missed something, but have you tried removing the
> nvidia closed source driver, completely, and using the regular system
> nv driver?
>
> Can you try doing that if you have not done so already?
>
> That is
>
> 1) Remove whatever nvidia closed driver you installed. Make really
> sure you removed it
Well I be darned no, I have in all the attempts removed any
of these drivers.
I've got a couple of other problems to solve.
# got 4GB of Ram
but not all are seen:
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 3002048 2030984 971064 0 97504 1240824
-/+ buffers/cache: 692656 2309392
Swap: 1020116 0 1020116
Video-card has its own whopping 256MB, so it doesn't steal
system-ram.
kernel is the Ubuntu-stock 2.6.24-20-rt right now I'm
building my own, as the second problem is related to the NIC
I get "tx unit hang errors" at boot up. the only workaround
so far that (somewhat) works if I append mem=4096MB to the
grub command-line.
The nvidia-driver installed now doesn't give me any problem.
But I'm sure the custom-kernel will have to run with a "nv"
driver. I'm not using all the eyecandy heck I still run XFCE
on a dual core AMD 3800+ old habits die not that easy. :-)
>
> 2) reboot
>
> 3) run dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
>
Dragomir Kollaric
--
This signature is licensed under the GPL and may be
freely distributed as long as a copy of the GPL is included... :-)
-
Re: Nvidia problems on Ubuntu 8.04
On 2008-07-31, Dragomir Kollaric wrote:
> On 2008-07-31, Ignoramus25244 hit the keyboard and wrote:
>
>> Dragomir, maybe I missed something, but have you tried removing the
>> nvidia closed source driver, completely, and using the regular system
>> nv driver?
>>
>> Can you try doing that if you have not done so already?
>>
>> That is
>>
>> 1) Remove whatever nvidia closed driver you installed. Make really
>> sure you removed it
>
> Well I be darned no, I have in all the attempts removed any
> of these drivers.
So, you removed them, and video card still does not work, even after
dpkg-reconfigure?
> I've got a couple of other problems to solve.
> # got 4GB of Ram
> but not all are seen:
> total used free shared buffers cached
> Mem: 3002048 2030984 971064 0 97504 1240824
> -/+ buffers/cache: 692656 2309392
> Swap: 1020116 0 1020116
Does the self test during BIOS boot report 4 GB?
Can you post the output of dmidecode?
sudo dmidecode > dmidecode.txt
> Video-card has its own whopping 256MB, so it doesn't steal
> system-ram.
>
> kernel is the Ubuntu-stock 2.6.24-20-rt right now I'm
> building my own, as the second problem is related to the NIC
> I get "tx unit hang errors" at boot up. the only workaround
> so far that (somewhat) works if I append mem=4096MB to the
> grub command-line.
strange
you are not using anything strange like a crossover cable?
> The nvidia-driver installed now doesn't give me any problem.
> But I'm sure the custom-kernel will have to run with a "nv"
> driver. I'm not using all the eyecandy heck I still run XFCE
> on a dual core AMD 3800+ old habits die not that easy. :-)
>
Nothing wrong with xfce. On my main home desktop, I reverted back to
FVWM.
i
>
>
>>
>> 2) reboot
>>
>> 3) run dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
>>
>
>
> Dragomir Kollaric
--
Due to extreme spam originating from Google Groups, and their inattention
to spammers, I and many others block all articles originating
from Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by
more readers you will need to find a different means of
posting on Usenet.
http://improve-usenet.org/
-
Re: Nvidia problems on Ubuntu 8.04
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:33:23 -0500, Ignoramus19611 wrote:
> On 2008-07-30, Meat Plow wrote:
>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:16:32 -0500, Ignoramus31137 wrote:
>>
>>> On 2008-07-29, Ramon wrote:
>>>> Meat Plow wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:32:51 +0200, Ramon wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Recently I've tried to install Nvidia graphics card driver (on
>>>>>> Ubuntu 8.04) by doing the following steps:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] sudo apt-get install nvidia-glx-new [2] sudo nvidia-xconfig
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The following error occurred when I've performed step [2]:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Using X configuration file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> VALIDATION ERROR: Data incomplete in file /etc/X11/xorg.conf.
>>>>>> Device section "Configured Video Device" must
>>>>>> have a
>>>>>> Driver line.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Backed up file '/etc/X11/xorg.conf' as '/etc/X11/xorg.conf.backup'
>>>>>> New X configuration file written to '/etc/X11/xorg.conf'
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've then restarted the X server (ctrl-alt-Delete since I am using
>>>>>> KDE) and the monitor suddenly turned off (there was no display)!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Probably, there is no display since my monitor's highest resolution
>>>>>> is 1024x768 and the graphics card driver is trying to use a higher
>>>>>> resolution (my graphics card is Nvidia 7300 GT).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any suggestions?
>>>>>
>>>>> sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Unfortunately "sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg" did not change the
>>>> displays situation!
>>>>
>>>> I have a strong feeling that there is no display since the nvidia
>>>> driver is trying to set a higher resolution than the monitor can
>>>> support. Is there a way how I can low the resolution?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> That driver is junk. Try uninstalling it and doing
>>>
>>> sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
>>
>> What nvidia driver should be used and why is nvidia-glx-new junk?
>>
>>
> The standard open source driver (without 3D acceleration) should be used
> if your nvidia-glx-new makes your systemn unstable. The river is junk
> because it is full of bugs and is closed source.
What bugs is it full of?
-
Re: Nvidia problems on Ubuntu 8.04
On 2008-07-31, Meat Plow wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:33:23 -0500, Ignoramus19611 wrote:
>
>> On 2008-07-30, Meat Plow wrote:
>>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:16:32 -0500, Ignoramus31137 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2008-07-29, Ramon wrote:
>>>>> Meat Plow wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:32:51 +0200, Ramon wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Recently I've tried to install Nvidia graphics card driver (on
>>>>>>> Ubuntu 8.04) by doing the following steps:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] sudo apt-get install nvidia-glx-new [2] sudo nvidia-xconfig
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The following error occurred when I've performed step [2]:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Using X configuration file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> VALIDATION ERROR: Data incomplete in file /etc/X11/xorg.conf.
>>>>>>> Device section "Configured Video Device" must
>>>>>>> have a
>>>>>>> Driver line.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Backed up file '/etc/X11/xorg.conf' as '/etc/X11/xorg.conf.backup'
>>>>>>> New X configuration file written to '/etc/X11/xorg.conf'
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I've then restarted the X server (ctrl-alt-Delete since I am using
>>>>>>> KDE) and the monitor suddenly turned off (there was no display)!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Probably, there is no display since my monitor's highest resolution
>>>>>>> is 1024x768 and the graphics card driver is trying to use a higher
>>>>>>> resolution (my graphics card is Nvidia 7300 GT).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Any suggestions?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> Unfortunately "sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg" did not change the
>>>>> displays situation!
>>>>>
>>>>> I have a strong feeling that there is no display since the nvidia
>>>>> driver is trying to set a higher resolution than the monitor can
>>>>> support. Is there a way how I can low the resolution?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>
>>>> That driver is junk. Try uninstalling it and doing
>>>>
>>>> sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
>>>
>>> What nvidia driver should be used and why is nvidia-glx-new junk?
>>>
>>>
>> The standard open source driver (without 3D acceleration) should be used
>> if your nvidia-glx-new makes your systemn unstable. The river is junk
>> because it is full of bugs and is closed source.
>
> What bugs is it full of?
>
Screen locking bugs, OS lockup bugs, and so on.
--
Due to extreme spam originating from Google Groups, and their inattention
to spammers, I and many others block all articles originating
from Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by
more readers you will need to find a different means of
posting on Usenet.
http://improve-usenet.org/
-
Re: Nvidia problems on Ubuntu 8.04
On 2008-07-31, Ignoramus25244 hit the keyboard and wrote:
> On 2008-07-31, Dragomir Kollaric wrote:
>> On 2008-07-31, Ignoramus25244 hit the keyboard and wrote:
>>
>>> Dragomir, maybe I missed something, but have you tried removing the
>>> nvidia closed source driver, completely, and using the regular system
>>> nv driver?
>>>
>>> Can you try doing that if you have not done so already?
>>>
>>> That is
>>>
>>> 1) Remove whatever nvidia closed driver you installed. Make really
>>> sure you removed it
>>
>> Well I be darned no, I have in all the attempts removed any
>> of these drivers.
>
> So, you removed them, and video card still does not work, even after
> dpkg-reconfigure?
Actually I have no problem with the nvidia driver now (as I didn't
have before) using the stock Ubuntu kernels. At first I used the
"nv" driver and installed them using "hard-ware drivers".
But using the installer from nvidia proper I run into problems.
Now I'm running a 2.6.25.9-custom-02 kernel with sound.
While the kernel was compiled, I removed everything relating to
nvidia, booted the new kernel and let enyng -t do it's thing, it
installed about 18 packages.
>
>> I've got a couple of other problems to solve.
>> # got 4GB of Ram
>> but not all are seen:
>> total used free shared buffers cached
>> Mem: 3002048 2030984 971064 0 97504 1240824
>> -/+ buffers/cache: 692656 2309392
>> Swap: 1020116 0 1020116
>
> Does the self test during BIOS boot report 4 GB?
Yeah it says I have 4096MB. Searching for the solution I came across
the hint that one can tell the kernel how much memory is in the box.
When I compiled the kernel I couln't find a option to tell it how
much RAM I wanted to use...
>
> Can you post the output of dmidecode?
>
> sudo dmidecode > dmidecode.txt
here it is: (and it is long...)
# dmidecode 2.9
SMBIOS 2.4 present.
30 structures occupying 1431 bytes.
Table at 0x000FBBD0.
Handle 0x0000, DMI type 0, 24 bytes
BIOS Information
Vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
Version: P1.90
Release Date: 05/04/2007
Address: 0xF0000
Runtime Size: 64 kB
ROM Size: 512 kB
Characteristics:
PCI is supported
BIOS is upgradeable
BIOS shadowing is allowed
Boot from CD is supported
Selectable boot is supported
BIOS ROM is socketed
EDD is supported
5.25"/1.2 MB floppy services are supported (int 13h)
3.5"/720 KB floppy services are supported (int 13h)
3.5"/2.88 MB floppy services are supported (int 13h)
Print screen service is supported (int 5h)
8042 keyboard services are supported (int 9h)
Serial services are supported (int 14h)
Printer services are supported (int 17h)
CGA/mono video services are supported (int 10h)
ACPI is supported
USB legacy is supported
LS-120 boot is supported
ATAPI Zip drive boot is supported
BIOS boot specification is supported
Function key-initiated network boot is supported
Targeted content distribution is supported
BIOS Revision: 8.12
Handle 0x0001, DMI type 1, 27 bytes
System Information
Manufacturer: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
Product Name: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
Version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
Serial Number: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
UUID: 00020003-0004-0005-0006-000700080009
Wake-up Type: Power Switch
SKU Number: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
Family: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
Handle 0x0002, DMI type 2, 15 bytes
Base Board Information
Manufacturer:
Product Name: AM2NF3-VSTA
Version:
Serial Number:
Asset Tag:
Features:
Board is a hosting board
Board is replaceable
Location In Chassis:
Chassis Handle: 0x0003
Type: Motherboard
Contained Object Handles: 0
Handle 0x0003, DMI type 3, 21 bytes
Chassis Information
Manufacturer: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
Type: Desktop
Lock: Not Present
Version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
Serial Number: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
Asset Tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
Boot-up State: Safe
Power Supply State: Safe
Thermal State: Safe
Security Status: None
OEM Information: 0x00000000
Height: Unspecified
Number Of Power Cords: 1
Contained Elements: 0
Handle 0x0004, DMI type 4, 35 bytes
Processor Information
Socket Designation: CPUSocket
Type: Central Processor
Family: Athlon 64 X2
Manufacturer: AMD
ID: B2 0F 04 00 FF FB 8B 17
Signature: Family 15, Model 75, Stepping 2
Flags:
FPU (Floating-point unit on-chip)
VME (Virtual mode extension)
DE (Debugging extension)
PSE (Page size extension)
TSC (Time stamp counter)
MSR (Model specific registers)
PAE (Physical address extension)
MCE (Machine check exception)
CX8 (CMPXCHG8 instruction supported)
APIC (On-chip APIC hardware supported)
SEP (Fast system call)
MTRR (Memory type range registers)
PGE (Page global enable)
MCA (Machine check architecture)
CMOV (Conditional move instruction supported)
PAT (Page attribute table)
PSE-36 (36-bit page size extension)
CLFSH (CLFLUSH instruction supported)
MMX (MMX technology supported)
FXSR (Fast floating-point save and restore)
SSE (Streaming SIMD extensions)
SSE2 (Streaming SIMD extensions 2)
HTT (Hyper-threading technology)
Version: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+
Voltage: 1.5 V
External Clock: 200 MHz
Max Speed: 2000 MHz
Current Speed: 2192 MHz
Status: Populated, Enabled
Upgrade: Socket 940
L1 Cache Handle: 0x0005
L2 Cache Handle: 0x0006
L3 Cache Handle: Not Provided
Serial Number: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
Asset Tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
Part Number: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
Handle 0x0005, DMI type 7, 19 bytes
Cache Information
Socket Designation: L1-Cache
Configuration: Enabled, Not Socketed, Level 1
Operational Mode: Varies With Memory Address
Location: Internal
Installed Size: 256 KB
Maximum Size: 256 KB
Supported SRAM Types:
Pipeline Burst
Installed SRAM Type: Pipeline Burst
Speed: Unknown
Error Correction Type: Single-bit ECC
System Type: Data
Associativity: 4-way Set-associative
Handle 0x0006, DMI type 7, 19 bytes
Cache Information
Socket Designation: L2-Cache
Configuration: Enabled, Not Socketed, Level 2
Operational Mode: Varies With Memory Address
Location: Internal
Installed Size: 1024 KB
Maximum Size: 1024 KB
Supported SRAM Types:
Pipeline Burst
Installed SRAM Type: Pipeline Burst
Speed: Unknown
Error Correction Type: Single-bit ECC
System Type: Unified
Associativity: 4-way Set-associative
Handle 0x0007, DMI type 5, 24 bytes
Memory Controller Information
Error Detecting Method: 64-bit ECC
Error Correcting Capabilities:
None
Supported Interleave: One-way Interleave
Current Interleave: One-way Interleave
Maximum Memory Module Size: 2048 MB
Maximum Total Memory Size: 8192 MB
Supported Speeds:
70 ns
60 ns
Supported Memory Types:
DIMM
SDRAM
Memory Module Voltage: 3.3 V
Associated Memory Slots: 4
0x0008
0x0009
0x000A
0x000B
Enabled Error Correcting Capabilities:
None
Handle 0x0008, DMI type 6, 12 bytes
Memory Module Information
Socket Designation: DIMM0
Bank Connections: 0 2
Current Speed: Unknown
Type: ECC DIMM
Installed Size: 1024 MB (Double-bank Connection)
Enabled Size: 1024 MB (Double-bank Connection)
Error Status: OK
Handle 0x0009, DMI type 6, 12 bytes
Memory Module Information
Socket Designation: DIMM1
Bank Connections: 0 2
Current Speed: Unknown
Type: ECC DIMM
Installed Size: 1024 MB (Double-bank Connection)
Enabled Size: 1024 MB (Double-bank Connection)
Error Status: OK
Handle 0x000A, DMI type 6, 12 bytes
Memory Module Information
Socket Designation: DIMM2
Bank Connections: 0 2
Current Speed: Unknown
Type: ECC DIMM
Installed Size: 1024 MB (Double-bank Connection)
Enabled Size: 1024 MB (Double-bank Connection)
Error Status: OK
Handle 0x000B, DMI type 6, 12 bytes
Memory Module Information
Socket Designation: DIMM3
Bank Connections: 0 2
Current Speed: Unknown
Type: ECC DIMM
Installed Size: 1024 MB (Double-bank Connection)
Enabled Size: 1024 MB (Double-bank Connection)
Error Status: OK
Handle 0x000C, DMI type 9, 13 bytes
System Slot Information
Designation: AGP
Type: 32-bit AGP 4x
Current Usage: In Use
Length: Short
ID: 0
Characteristics:
3.3 V is provided
Opening is shared
PME signal is supported
Handle 0x000D, DMI type 9, 13 bytes
System Slot Information
Designation: PCI1
Type: 32-bit PCI
Current Usage: Available
Length: Short
ID: 1
Characteristics:
3.3 V is provided
Opening is shared
PME signal is supported
Handle 0x000E, DMI type 9, 13 bytes
System Slot Information
Designation: PCI2
Type: 32-bit PCI
Current Usage: Available
Length: Short
ID: 2
Characteristics:
3.3 V is provided
Opening is shared
PME signal is supported
Handle 0x000F, DMI type 9, 13 bytes
System Slot Information
Designation: PCI3
Type: 32-bit PCI
Current Usage: In Use
Length: Short
ID: 3
Characteristics:
3.3 V is provided
Opening is shared
PME signal is supported
Handle 0x0010, DMI type 9, 13 bytes
System Slot Information
Designation: PCI4
Type: 32-bit PCI
Current Usage: In Use
Length: Short
ID: 4
Characteristics:
3.3 V is provided
Opening is shared
PME signal is supported
Handle 0x0011, DMI type 9, 13 bytes
System Slot Information
Designation: PCI5
Type: 32-bit PCI
Current Usage: In Use
Length: Short
ID: 5
Characteristics:
3.3 V is provided
Opening is shared
PME signal is supported
Handle 0x0012, DMI type 16, 15 bytes
Physical Memory Array
Location: System Board Or Motherboard
Use: System Memory
Error Correction Type: None
Maximum Capacity: 8 GB
Error Information Handle: Not Provided
Number Of Devices: 4
Handle 0x0013, DMI type 19, 15 bytes
Memory Array Mapped Address
Starting Address: 0x00000000000
Ending Address: 0x00143FFFFFF
Range Size: 5184 MB
Physical Array Handle: 0x0012
Partition Width: 0
Handle 0x0014, DMI type 17, 27 bytes
Memory Device
Array Handle: 0x0012
Error Information Handle: Not Provided
Total Width: 64 bits
Data Width: 72 bits
Size: 1024 MB
Form Factor: DIMM
Set: None
Locator: DIMM0
Bank Locator: BANK0
Type: DDR2
Type Detail: Synchronous
Speed: 533 MHz (1.9 ns)
Manufacturer: Manufacturer0
Serial Number: SerNum0
Asset Tag: AssetTagNum0
Part Number: PartNum0
Handle 0x0015, DMI type 20, 19 bytes
Memory Device Mapped Address
Starting Address: 0x00000000000
Ending Address: 0x0003FFFFFFF
Range Size: 1 GB
Physical Device Handle: 0x0014
Memory Array Mapped Address Handle: 0x0013
Partition Row Position: 1
Handle 0x0016, DMI type 17, 27 bytes
Memory Device
Array Handle: 0x0012
Error Information Handle: Not Provided
Total Width: 64 bits
Data Width: 72 bits
Size: 1024 MB
Form Factor: DIMM
Set: None
Locator: DIMM1
Bank Locator: BANK1
Type: DDR2
Type Detail: Synchronous
Speed: 533 MHz (1.9 ns)
Manufacturer: Manufacturer1
Serial Number: SerNum1
Asset Tag: AssetTagNum1
Part Number: PartNum1
Handle 0x0017, DMI type 20, 19 bytes
Memory Device Mapped Address
Starting Address: 0x00040000000
Ending Address: 0x0007FFFFFFF
Range Size: 1 GB
Physical Device Handle: 0x0016
Memory Array Mapped Address Handle: 0x0013
Partition Row Position: 1
Handle 0x0018, DMI type 17, 27 bytes
Memory Device
Array Handle: 0x0012
Error Information Handle: Not Provided
Total Width: 64 bits
Data Width: 72 bits
Size: 1024 MB
Form Factor: DIMM
Set: None
Locator: DIMM2
Bank Locator: BANK2
Type: DDR2
Type Detail: Synchronous
Speed: 533 MHz (1.9 ns)
Manufacturer: Manufacturer2
Serial Number: SerNum2
Asset Tag: AssetTagNum2
Part Number: PartNum2
Handle 0x0019, DMI type 20, 19 bytes
Memory Device Mapped Address
Starting Address: 0x00080000000
Ending Address: 0x000BFFFFFFF
Range Size: 1 GB
Physical Device Handle: 0x0018
Memory Array Mapped Address Handle: 0x0013
Partition Row Position: 1
Handle 0x001A, DMI type 17, 27 bytes
Memory Device
Array Handle: 0x0012
Error Information Handle: Not Provided
Total Width: 64 bits
Data Width: 72 bits
Size: 1024 MB
Form Factor: DIMM
Set: None
Locator: DIMM3
Bank Locator: BANK3
Type: DDR2
Type Detail: Synchronous
Speed: 533 MHz (1.9 ns)
Manufacturer: Manufacturer3
Serial Number: SerNum3
Asset Tag: AssetTagNum3
Part Number: PartNum3
Handle 0x001B, DMI type 20, 19 bytes
Memory Device Mapped Address
Starting Address: 0x000C0000000
Ending Address: 0x000FFFFFFFF
Range Size: 1 GB
Physical Device Handle: 0x001A
Memory Array Mapped Address Handle: 0x0013
Partition Row Position: 1
Handle 0x001C, DMI type 32, 20 bytes
System Boot Information
Status: No errors detected
Handle 0x001D, DMI type 127, 4 bytes
End Of Table
Hmmm I'm not sure if this matters, but it seems that the RAM-Sticks
are not the same (contray to what I thought) Size 1GB vs 1024MB, but
when I remove the line mem=4096MB from grub, it will start up, fine,
but I'll ger the error related to the NIC. "Tx unit hang" I'd
rather get online with 3GB then not and have all 4 GB available...
>
>> Video-card has its own whopping 256MB, so it doesn't steal
>> system-ram.
>>
>> kernel is the Ubuntu-stock 2.6.24-20-rt right now I'm
>> building my own, as the second problem is related to the NIC
>> I get "tx unit hang errors" at boot up. the only workaround
>> so far that (somewhat) works if I append mem=4096MB to the
>> grub command-line.
>
> strange
>
> you are not using anything strange like a crossover cable?
Maybe, at least I didn't by one for it. I've got here cable-modem
and fouznd out yesterday I could hook up a USB-cable, I looked in
the manual, but I couldn't find any hit if this was USB1 or USB2
which of course I'd prefer. The Modem is a few years old 2004 or
so IIRC.
driver: rndis_host
version: 22-Aug-2005
firmware-version: RNDIS device
bus-info: usb-0000:00:02.0-4
Bus 006 Device 002: ID 0766:0012 Jess-Link Products Co., Ltd
Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002
Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001
Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001
Bus 003 Device 002: ID 0d8c:0201 C-Media Electronics, Inc.
Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001
Bus 001 Device 003: ID 09c1:1337 Arris Interactive LLC
Bus 001 Device 002: ID 046d:c040 Logitech, Inc.
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001
>
>> The nvidia-driver installed now doesn't give me any problem.
>> But I'm sure the custom-kernel will have to run with a "nv"
>> driver. I'm not using all the eyecandy heck I still run XFCE
>> on a dual core AMD 3800+ old habits die not that easy. :-)
>>
>
> Nothing wrong with xfce. On my main home desktop, I reverted back to
> FVWM.
>
I think it's a option on the Laptop I've got with DSL 486er
CPU and 2GB HDD 16MB of Ram...
> i
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> 2) reboot
>>>
>>> 3) run dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
>>>
>>
>>
>> Dragomir Kollaric
>
Dragomir Kollaric
--
This signature is licensed under the GPL and may be
freely distributed as long as a copy of the GPL is included... :-)
-
Re: Nvidia problems on Ubuntu 8.04
On 2008-07-31, Dragomir Kollaric wrote:
> On 2008-07-31, Ignoramus25244 hit the keyboard and wrote:
>> On 2008-07-31, Dragomir Kollaric wrote:
>>> On 2008-07-31, Ignoramus25244 hit the keyboard and wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dragomir, maybe I missed something, but have you tried removing the
>>>> nvidia closed source driver, completely, and using the regular system
>>>> nv driver?
>>>>
>>>> Can you try doing that if you have not done so already?
>>>>
>>>> That is
>>>>
>>>> 1) Remove whatever nvidia closed driver you installed. Make really
>>>> sure you removed it
>>>
>>> Well I be darned no, I have in all the attempts removed any
>>> of these drivers.
>>
>> So, you removed them, and video card still does not work, even after
>> dpkg-reconfigure?
>
> Actually I have no problem with the nvidia driver now (as I didn't
> have before) using the stock Ubuntu kernels. At first I used the
> "nv" driver and installed them using "hard-ware drivers".
> But using the installer from nvidia proper I run into problems.
I see. My experience was the same.
> Now I'm running a 2.6.25.9-custom-02 kernel with sound.
Did you compile it yourself?
Accidentally, I am experimenting on the 2.6.25 64 bit kernel, myself,
and early indications suggest improved network performance compared to
2.6.24 and 2.6.22.
> While the kernel was compiled, I removed everything relating to
> nvidia, booted the new kernel and let enyng -t do it's thing, it
> installed about 18 packages.
>
>
>>
>>> I've got a couple of other problems to solve.
>>> # got 4GB of Ram
>>> but not all are seen:
>>> total used free shared buffers cached
>>> Mem: 3002048 2030984 971064 0 97504 1240824
>>> -/+ buffers/cache: 692656 2309392
>>> Swap: 1020116 0 1020116
>>
>> Does the self test during BIOS boot report 4 GB?
>
> Yeah it says I have 4096MB. Searching for the solution I came across
> the hint that one can tell the kernel how much memory is in the box.
> When I compiled the kernel I couln't find a option to tell it how
> much RAM I wanted to use...
>
>>
>> Can you post the output of dmidecode?
>>
>> sudo dmidecode > dmidecode.txt
>
> here it is: (and it is long...)
>
> # dmidecode 2.9
> SMBIOS 2.4 present.
> 30 structures occupying 1431 bytes.
> Table at 0x000FBBD0.
>
> Handle 0x0000, DMI type 0, 24 bytes
> BIOS Information
> Vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
> Version: P1.90
> Release Date: 05/04/2007
> Address: 0xF0000
> Runtime Size: 64 kB
> ROM Size: 512 kB
> Characteristics:
> PCI is supported
> BIOS is upgradeable
> BIOS shadowing is allowed
> Boot from CD is supported
> Selectable boot is supported
> BIOS ROM is socketed
> EDD is supported
> 5.25"/1.2 MB floppy services are supported (int 13h)
> 3.5"/720 KB floppy services are supported (int 13h)
> 3.5"/2.88 MB floppy services are supported (int 13h)
> Print screen service is supported (int 5h)
> 8042 keyboard services are supported (int 9h)
> Serial services are supported (int 14h)
> Printer services are supported (int 17h)
> CGA/mono video services are supported (int 10h)
> ACPI is supported
> USB legacy is supported
> LS-120 boot is supported
> ATAPI Zip drive boot is supported
> BIOS boot specification is supported
> Function key-initiated network boot is supported
> Targeted content distribution is supported
> BIOS Revision: 8.12
>
> Handle 0x0001, DMI type 1, 27 bytes
> System Information
> Manufacturer: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
> Product Name: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
> Version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
> Serial Number: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
> UUID: 00020003-0004-0005-0006-000700080009
> Wake-up Type: Power Switch
> SKU Number: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
> Family: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
>
> Handle 0x0002, DMI type 2, 15 bytes
> Base Board Information
> Manufacturer:
> Product Name: AM2NF3-VSTA
> Version:
> Serial Number:
> Asset Tag:
> Features:
> Board is a hosting board
> Board is replaceable
> Location In Chassis:
> Chassis Handle: 0x0003
> Type: Motherboard
> Contained Object Handles: 0
>
> Handle 0x0003, DMI type 3, 21 bytes
> Chassis Information
> Manufacturer: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
> Type: Desktop
> Lock: Not Present
> Version: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
> Serial Number: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
> Asset Tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
> Boot-up State: Safe
> Power Supply State: Safe
> Thermal State: Safe
> Security Status: None
> OEM Information: 0x00000000
> Height: Unspecified
> Number Of Power Cords: 1
> Contained Elements: 0
>
> Handle 0x0004, DMI type 4, 35 bytes
> Processor Information
> Socket Designation: CPUSocket
> Type: Central Processor
> Family: Athlon 64 X2
> Manufacturer: AMD
> ID: B2 0F 04 00 FF FB 8B 17
> Signature: Family 15, Model 75, Stepping 2
> Flags:
> FPU (Floating-point unit on-chip)
> VME (Virtual mode extension)
> DE (Debugging extension)
> PSE (Page size extension)
> TSC (Time stamp counter)
> MSR (Model specific registers)
> PAE (Physical address extension)
> MCE (Machine check exception)
> CX8 (CMPXCHG8 instruction supported)
> APIC (On-chip APIC hardware supported)
> SEP (Fast system call)
> MTRR (Memory type range registers)
> PGE (Page global enable)
> MCA (Machine check architecture)
> CMOV (Conditional move instruction supported)
> PAT (Page attribute table)
> PSE-36 (36-bit page size extension)
> CLFSH (CLFLUSH instruction supported)
> MMX (MMX technology supported)
> FXSR (Fast floating-point save and restore)
> SSE (Streaming SIMD extensions)
> SSE2 (Streaming SIMD extensions 2)
> HTT (Hyper-threading technology)
> Version: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+
> Voltage: 1.5 V
> External Clock: 200 MHz
> Max Speed: 2000 MHz
> Current Speed: 2192 MHz
> Status: Populated, Enabled
> Upgrade: Socket 940
> L1 Cache Handle: 0x0005
> L2 Cache Handle: 0x0006
> L3 Cache Handle: Not Provided
> Serial Number: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
> Asset Tag: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
> Part Number: To Be Filled By O.E.M.
>
> Handle 0x0005, DMI type 7, 19 bytes
> Cache Information
> Socket Designation: L1-Cache
> Configuration: Enabled, Not Socketed, Level 1
> Operational Mode: Varies With Memory Address
> Location: Internal
> Installed Size: 256 KB
> Maximum Size: 256 KB
> Supported SRAM Types:
> Pipeline Burst
> Installed SRAM Type: Pipeline Burst
> Speed: Unknown
> Error Correction Type: Single-bit ECC
> System Type: Data
> Associativity: 4-way Set-associative
>
> Handle 0x0006, DMI type 7, 19 bytes
> Cache Information
> Socket Designation: L2-Cache
> Configuration: Enabled, Not Socketed, Level 2
> Operational Mode: Varies With Memory Address
> Location: Internal
> Installed Size: 1024 KB
> Maximum Size: 1024 KB
> Supported SRAM Types:
> Pipeline Burst
> Installed SRAM Type: Pipeline Burst
> Speed: Unknown
> Error Correction Type: Single-bit ECC
> System Type: Unified
> Associativity: 4-way Set-associative
>
> Handle 0x0007, DMI type 5, 24 bytes
> Memory Controller Information
> Error Detecting Method: 64-bit ECC
> Error Correcting Capabilities:
> None
> Supported Interleave: One-way Interleave
> Current Interleave: One-way Interleave
> Maximum Memory Module Size: 2048 MB
> Maximum Total Memory Size: 8192 MB
> Supported Speeds:
> 70 ns
> 60 ns
> Supported Memory Types:
> DIMM
> SDRAM
> Memory Module Voltage: 3.3 V
> Associated Memory Slots: 4
> 0x0008
> 0x0009
> 0x000A
> 0x000B
> Enabled Error Correcting Capabilities:
> None
>
> Handle 0x0008, DMI type 6, 12 bytes
> Memory Module Information
> Socket Designation: DIMM0
> Bank Connections: 0 2
> Current Speed: Unknown
> Type: ECC DIMM
> Installed Size: 1024 MB (Double-bank Connection)
> Enabled Size: 1024 MB (Double-bank Connection)
> Error Status: OK
>
> Handle 0x0009, DMI type 6, 12 bytes
> Memory Module Information
> Socket Designation: DIMM1
> Bank Connections: 0 2
> Current Speed: Unknown
> Type: ECC DIMM
> Installed Size: 1024 MB (Double-bank Connection)
> Enabled Size: 1024 MB (Double-bank Connection)
> Error Status: OK
>
> Handle 0x000A, DMI type 6, 12 bytes
> Memory Module Information
> Socket Designation: DIMM2
> Bank Connections: 0 2
> Current Speed: Unknown
> Type: ECC DIMM
> Installed Size: 1024 MB (Double-bank Connection)
> Enabled Size: 1024 MB (Double-bank Connection)
> Error Status: OK
>
> Handle 0x000B, DMI type 6, 12 bytes
> Memory Module Information
> Socket Designation: DIMM3
> Bank Connections: 0 2
> Current Speed: Unknown
> Type: ECC DIMM
> Installed Size: 1024 MB (Double-bank Connection)
> Enabled Size: 1024 MB (Double-bank Connection)
> Error Status: OK
>
> Handle 0x000C, DMI type 9, 13 bytes
> System Slot Information
> Designation: AGP
> Type: 32-bit AGP 4x
> Current Usage: In Use
> Length: Short
> ID: 0
> Characteristics:
> 3.3 V is provided
> Opening is shared
> PME signal is supported
>
> Handle 0x000D, DMI type 9, 13 bytes
> System Slot Information
> Designation: PCI1
> Type: 32-bit PCI
> Current Usage: Available
> Length: Short
> ID: 1
> Characteristics:
> 3.3 V is provided
> Opening is shared
> PME signal is supported
>
> Handle 0x000E, DMI type 9, 13 bytes
> System Slot Information
> Designation: PCI2
> Type: 32-bit PCI
> Current Usage: Available
> Length: Short
> ID: 2
> Characteristics:
> 3.3 V is provided
> Opening is shared
> PME signal is supported
>
> Handle 0x000F, DMI type 9, 13 bytes
> System Slot Information
> Designation: PCI3
> Type: 32-bit PCI
> Current Usage: In Use
> Length: Short
> ID: 3
> Characteristics:
> 3.3 V is provided
> Opening is shared
> PME signal is supported
>
> Handle 0x0010, DMI type 9, 13 bytes
> System Slot Information
> Designation: PCI4
> Type: 32-bit PCI
> Current Usage: In Use
> Length: Short
> ID: 4
> Characteristics:
> 3.3 V is provided
> Opening is shared
> PME signal is supported
>
> Handle 0x0011, DMI type 9, 13 bytes
> System Slot Information
> Designation: PCI5
> Type: 32-bit PCI
> Current Usage: In Use
> Length: Short
> ID: 5
> Characteristics:
> 3.3 V is provided
> Opening is shared
> PME signal is supported
>
> Handle 0x0012, DMI type 16, 15 bytes
> Physical Memory Array
> Location: System Board Or Motherboard
> Use: System Memory
> Error Correction Type: None
> Maximum Capacity: 8 GB
> Error Information Handle: Not Provided
> Number Of Devices: 4
>
> Handle 0x0013, DMI type 19, 15 bytes
> Memory Array Mapped Address
> Starting Address: 0x00000000000
> Ending Address: 0x00143FFFFFF
> Range Size: 5184 MB
> Physical Array Handle: 0x0012
> Partition Width: 0
>
> Handle 0x0014, DMI type 17, 27 bytes
> Memory Device
> Array Handle: 0x0012
> Error Information Handle: Not Provided
> Total Width: 64 bits
> Data Width: 72 bits
> Size: 1024 MB
> Form Factor: DIMM
> Set: None
> Locator: DIMM0
> Bank Locator: BANK0
> Type: DDR2
> Type Detail: Synchronous
> Speed: 533 MHz (1.9 ns)
> Manufacturer: Manufacturer0
> Serial Number: SerNum0
> Asset Tag: AssetTagNum0
> Part Number: PartNum0
>
> Handle 0x0015, DMI type 20, 19 bytes
> Memory Device Mapped Address
> Starting Address: 0x00000000000
> Ending Address: 0x0003FFFFFFF
> Range Size: 1 GB
> Physical Device Handle: 0x0014
> Memory Array Mapped Address Handle: 0x0013
> Partition Row Position: 1
>
> Handle 0x0016, DMI type 17, 27 bytes
> Memory Device
> Array Handle: 0x0012
> Error Information Handle: Not Provided
> Total Width: 64 bits
> Data Width: 72 bits
> Size: 1024 MB
> Form Factor: DIMM
> Set: None
> Locator: DIMM1
> Bank Locator: BANK1
> Type: DDR2
> Type Detail: Synchronous
> Speed: 533 MHz (1.9 ns)
> Manufacturer: Manufacturer1
> Serial Number: SerNum1
> Asset Tag: AssetTagNum1
> Part Number: PartNum1
>
> Handle 0x0017, DMI type 20, 19 bytes
> Memory Device Mapped Address
> Starting Address: 0x00040000000
> Ending Address: 0x0007FFFFFFF
> Range Size: 1 GB
> Physical Device Handle: 0x0016
> Memory Array Mapped Address Handle: 0x0013
> Partition Row Position: 1
>
> Handle 0x0018, DMI type 17, 27 bytes
> Memory Device
> Array Handle: 0x0012
> Error Information Handle: Not Provided
> Total Width: 64 bits
> Data Width: 72 bits
> Size: 1024 MB
> Form Factor: DIMM
> Set: None
> Locator: DIMM2
> Bank Locator: BANK2
> Type: DDR2
> Type Detail: Synchronous
> Speed: 533 MHz (1.9 ns)
> Manufacturer: Manufacturer2
> Serial Number: SerNum2
> Asset Tag: AssetTagNum2
> Part Number: PartNum2
>
> Handle 0x0019, DMI type 20, 19 bytes
> Memory Device Mapped Address
> Starting Address: 0x00080000000
> Ending Address: 0x000BFFFFFFF
> Range Size: 1 GB
> Physical Device Handle: 0x0018
> Memory Array Mapped Address Handle: 0x0013
> Partition Row Position: 1
>
> Handle 0x001A, DMI type 17, 27 bytes
> Memory Device
> Array Handle: 0x0012
> Error Information Handle: Not Provided
> Total Width: 64 bits
> Data Width: 72 bits
> Size: 1024 MB
> Form Factor: DIMM
> Set: None
> Locator: DIMM3
> Bank Locator: BANK3
> Type: DDR2
> Type Detail: Synchronous
> Speed: 533 MHz (1.9 ns)
> Manufacturer: Manufacturer3
> Serial Number: SerNum3
> Asset Tag: AssetTagNum3
> Part Number: PartNum3
>
> Handle 0x001B, DMI type 20, 19 bytes
> Memory Device Mapped Address
> Starting Address: 0x000C0000000
> Ending Address: 0x000FFFFFFFF
> Range Size: 1 GB
> Physical Device Handle: 0x001A
> Memory Array Mapped Address Handle: 0x0013
> Partition Row Position: 1
>
> Handle 0x001C, DMI type 32, 20 bytes
> System Boot Information
> Status: No errors detected
>
> Handle 0x001D, DMI type 127, 4 bytes
> End Of Table
>
>
> Hmmm I'm not sure if this matters, but it seems that the RAM-Sticks
> are not the same (contray to what I thought) Size 1GB vs 1024MB, but
> when I remove the line mem=4096MB from grub, it will start up, fine,
> but I'll ger the error related to the NIC. "Tx unit hang" I'd
> rather get online with 3GB then not and have all 4 GB available...
I thought that all your ram sticks are the same? Did I miss soemthing?
>
>>
>>> Video-card has its own whopping 256MB, so it doesn't steal
>>> system-ram.
>>>
>>> kernel is the Ubuntu-stock 2.6.24-20-rt right now I'm
>>> building my own, as the second problem is related to the NIC
>>> I get "tx unit hang errors" at boot up. the only workaround
>>> so far that (somewhat) works if I append mem=4096MB to the
>>> grub command-line.
>>
>> strange
>>
>> you are not using anything strange like a crossover cable?
>
> Maybe, at least I didn't by one for it. I've got here cable-modem
> and fouznd out yesterday I could hook up a USB-cable, I looked in
> the manual, but I couldn't find any hit if this was USB1 or USB2
> which of course I'd prefer. The Modem is a few years old 2004 or
> so IIRC.
>
> driver: rndis_host
> version: 22-Aug-2005
> firmware-version: RNDIS device
> bus-info: usb-0000:00:02.0-4
>
> Bus 006 Device 002: ID 0766:0012 Jess-Link Products Co., Ltd
> Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002
> Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002
> Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001
> Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001
> Bus 003 Device 002: ID 0d8c:0201 C-Media Electronics, Inc.
> Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001
> Bus 001 Device 003: ID 09c1:1337 Arris Interactive LLC
> Bus 001 Device 002: ID 046d:c040 Logitech, Inc.
> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001
I would try to connect to a regular hub or switch and through that, to
another computer, and see if you get any errors, just to eliminate
possibilities.
>>> The nvidia-driver installed now doesn't give me any problem.
>>> But I'm sure the custom-kernel will have to run with a "nv"
>>> driver. I'm not using all the eyecandy heck I still run XFCE
>>> on a dual core AMD 3800+ old habits die not that easy. :-)
>>>
>>
>> Nothing wrong with xfce. On my main home desktop, I reverted back to
>> FVWM.
>>
>
> I think it's a option on the Laptop I've got with DSL 486er
> CPU and 2GB HDD 16MB of Ram...
It is an option on Ubuntu also, very nice of them.
i
>
>> i
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2) reboot
>>>>
>>>> 3) run dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Dragomir Kollaric
>>
>
>
>
> Dragomir Kollaric
--
Due to extreme spam originating from Google Groups, and their inattention
to spammers, I and many others block all articles originating
from Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by
more readers you will need to find a different means of
posting on Usenet.
http://improve-usenet.org/
-
Re: Nvidia problems on Ubuntu 8.04
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:20:08 -0500, Ignoramus25244 wrote:
> On 2008-07-31, Meat Plow wrote:
>> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:33:23 -0500, Ignoramus19611 wrote:
>>
>>> On 2008-07-30, Meat Plow wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:16:32 -0500, Ignoramus31137 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2008-07-29, Ramon wrote:
>>>>>> Meat Plow wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:32:51 +0200, Ramon wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Recently I've tried to install Nvidia graphics card driver (on
>>>>>>>> Ubuntu 8.04) by doing the following steps:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1] sudo apt-get install nvidia-glx-new [2] sudo nvidia-xconfig
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The following error occurred when I've performed step [2]:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Using X configuration file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> VALIDATION ERROR: Data incomplete in file /etc/X11/xorg.conf.
>>>>>>>> Device section "Configured Video Device" must
>>>>>>>> have a
>>>>>>>> Driver line.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Backed up file '/etc/X11/xorg.conf' as '/etc/X11/xorg.conf.backup'
>>>>>>>> New X configuration file written to '/etc/X11/xorg.conf'
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've then restarted the X server (ctrl-alt-Delete since I am using
>>>>>>>> KDE) and the monitor suddenly turned off (there was no display)!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Probably, there is no display since my monitor's highest
>>>>>>>> resolution is 1024x768 and the graphics card driver is trying to
>>>>>>>> use a higher resolution (my graphics card is Nvidia 7300 GT).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any suggestions?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Unfortunately "sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg" did not change
>>>>>> the displays situation!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I have a strong feeling that there is no display since the nvidia
>>>>>> driver is trying to set a higher resolution than the monitor can
>>>>>> support. Is there a way how I can low the resolution?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>
>>>>> That driver is junk. Try uninstalling it and doing
>>>>>
>>>>> sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
>>>>
>>>> What nvidia driver should be used and why is nvidia-glx-new junk?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> The standard open source driver (without 3D acceleration) should be
>>> used if your nvidia-glx-new makes your systemn unstable. The river is
>>> junk because it is full of bugs and is closed source.
>>
>> What bugs is it full of?
>>
>>
> Screen locking bugs, OS lockup bugs, and so on.
Hmm that's a shame. I don't have any problems.
http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/j...reenshot-2.jpg
http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/j...reenshot-1.jpg
http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/j.../snapshot4.jpg
-
Re: Nvidia problems on Ubuntu 8.04
On 2008-07-31, Meat Plow wrote:
> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:20:08 -0500, Ignoramus25244 wrote:
>
>> On 2008-07-31, Meat Plow wrote:
>>> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:33:23 -0500, Ignoramus19611 wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2008-07-30, Meat Plow wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:16:32 -0500, Ignoramus31137 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2008-07-29, Ramon wrote:
>>>>>>> Meat Plow wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:32:51 +0200, Ramon wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Recently I've tried to install Nvidia graphics card driver (on
>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu 8.04) by doing the following steps:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1] sudo apt-get install nvidia-glx-new [2] sudo nvidia-xconfig
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The following error occurred when I've performed step [2]:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Using X configuration file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf".
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> VALIDATION ERROR: Data incomplete in file /etc/X11/xorg.conf.
>>>>>>>>> Device section "Configured Video Device" must
>>>>>>>>> have a
>>>>>>>>> Driver line.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Backed up file '/etc/X11/xorg.conf' as '/etc/X11/xorg.conf.backup'
>>>>>>>>> New X configuration file written to '/etc/X11/xorg.conf'
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've then restarted the X server (ctrl-alt-Delete since I am using
>>>>>>>>> KDE) and the monitor suddenly turned off (there was no display)!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Probably, there is no display since my monitor's highest
>>>>>>>>> resolution is 1024x768 and the graphics card driver is trying to
>>>>>>>>> use a higher resolution (my graphics card is Nvidia 7300 GT).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any suggestions?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Unfortunately "sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg" did not change
>>>>>>> the displays situation!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have a strong feeling that there is no display since the nvidia
>>>>>>> driver is trying to set a higher resolution than the monitor can
>>>>>>> support. Is there a way how I can low the resolution?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That driver is junk. Try uninstalling it and doing
>>>>>>
>>>>>> sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
>>>>>
>>>>> What nvidia driver should be used and why is nvidia-glx-new junk?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> The standard open source driver (without 3D acceleration) should be
>>>> used if your nvidia-glx-new makes your systemn unstable. The river is
>>>> junk because it is full of bugs and is closed source.
>>>
>>> What bugs is it full of?
>>>
>>>
>> Screen locking bugs, OS lockup bugs, and so on.
>
> Hmm that's a shame. I don't have any problems.
>
> http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/j...reenshot-2.jpg
>
> http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/j...reenshot-1.jpg
>
> http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/j.../snapshot4.jpg
>
>
Good for you. Nice newsgroup selection under your newsreader.
--
Due to extreme spam originating from Google Groups, and their inattention
to spammers, I and many others block all articles originating
from Google Groups. If you want your postings to be seen by
more readers you will need to find a different means of
posting on Usenet.
http://improve-usenet.org/
-
Re: Nvidia problems on Ubuntu 8.04
On 2008-07-31, Ignoramus25244 hit the keyboard and wrote:
> On 2008-07-31, Dragomir Kollaric wrote:
>> On 2008-07-31, Ignoramus25244 hit the keyboard and wrote:
>>> On 2008-07-31, Dragomir Kollaric wrote:
>>>> On 2008-07-31, Ignoramus25244 hit the keyboard and wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dragomir, maybe I missed something, but have you tried removing the
>>>>> nvidia closed source driver, completely, and using the regular system
>>>>> nv driver?
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you try doing that if you have not done so already?
>>>>>
>>>>> That is
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Remove whatever nvidia closed driver you installed. Make really
>>>>> sure you removed it
>>>>
>>>> Well I be darned no, I have in all the attempts removed any
>>>> of these drivers.
>>>
>>> So, you removed them, and video card still does not work, even after
>>> dpkg-reconfigure?
>>
>> Actually I have no problem with the nvidia driver now (as I didn't
>> have before) using the stock Ubuntu kernels. At first I used the
>> "nv" driver and installed them using "hard-ware drivers".
>> But using the installer from nvidia proper I run into problems.
>
> I see. My experience was the same.
>
>> Now I'm running a 2.6.25.9-custom-02 kernel with sound.
>
> Did you compile it yourself?
Yeah used to do so every couple of months when I started out
using Gnu/Linux almost 8 years ago. Back then I didn't
compile all these unnecessary modules. I might do the same
here too one of these days...But to get through the menus to
uncheck them will take also some time, and the option to
remove something that is needed.... It took about an hour...
>
> Accidentally, I am experimenting on the 2.6.25 64 bit kernel, myself,
> and early indications suggest improved network performance compared to
> 2.6.24 and 2.6.22.
As I don't run any servers or the like... :-)
>>
>> Hmmm I'm not sure if this matters, but it seems that the RAM-Sticks
>> are not the same (contray to what I thought) Size 1GB vs 1024MB, but
>> when I remove the line mem=4096MB from grub, it will start up, fine,
>> but I'll ger the error related to the NIC. "Tx unit hang" I'd
>> rather get online with 3GB then not and have all 4 GB available...
>
> I thought that all your ram sticks are the same? Did I miss soemthing?
Two of them are listed as being 1024MB the other two as 1GB.
I bought them at different places, but made sure they were
all the same (in fact they were advertised as 1GB sticks.
But that shouldn't give any problems. It's the NIC that
gives me troubles, I also installed the newest version of
the module for it, but still the same, if I remove the
mem=4096MB the kernel sees all 4GB (in fact a bit more) but
then I can't get the NIC up and running. As to the USB-port
for the cable-modem I might call the ISP, see what they've
got to say.
>
>>
>>>
>>>> Video-card has its own whopping 256MB, so it doesn't steal
>>>> system-ram.
>>>>
>>>> kernel is the Ubuntu-stock 2.6.24-20-rt right now I'm
>>>> building my own, as the second problem is related to the NIC
>>>> I get "tx unit hang errors" at boot up. the only workaround
>>>> so far that (somewhat) works if I append mem=4096MB to the
>>>> grub command-line.
>>>
>>> strange
>>>
>>> you are not using anything strange like a crossover cable?
>>
>> Maybe, at least I didn't by one for it. I've got here cable-modem
>> and fouznd out yesterday I could hook up a USB-cable, I looked in
>> the manual, but I couldn't find any hit if this was USB1 or USB2
>> which of course I'd prefer. The Modem is a few years old 2004 or
>> so IIRC.
>>
>> driver: rndis_host
>> version: 22-Aug-2005
>> firmware-version: RNDIS device
>> bus-info: usb-0000:00:02.0-4
>>
>> Bus 006 Device 002: ID 0766:0012 Jess-Link Products Co., Ltd
>> Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002
>> Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002
>> Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001
>> Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001
>> Bus 003 Device 002: ID 0d8c:0201 C-Media Electronics, Inc.
>> Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001
>> Bus 001 Device 003: ID 09c1:1337 Arris Interactive LLC
>> Bus 001 Device 002: ID 046d:c040 Logitech, Inc.
>> Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001
>
> I would try to connect to a regular hub or switch and through that, to
> another computer, and see if you get any errors, just to eliminate
> possibilities.
This is not possible here, the other PC is very old, and in
pieces right now as I used the NIC for this one.
>
>>>> The nvidia-driver installed now doesn't give me any problem.
>>>> But I'm sure the custom-kernel will have to run with a "nv"
>>>> driver. I'm not using all the eyecandy heck I still run XFCE
>>>> on a dual core AMD 3800+ old habits die not that easy. :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Nothing wrong with xfce. On my main home desktop, I reverted back to
>>> FVWM.
>>>
>>
>> I think it's a option on the Laptop I've got with DSL 486er
>> CPU and 2GB HDD 16MB of Ram...
>
> It is an option on Ubuntu also, very nice of them.
>
> i
Dragomir Kollaric
--
This signature is licensed under the GPL and may be
freely distributed as long as a copy of the GPL is included... :-)
-
Re: Nvidia problems on Ubuntu 8.04
On 07/31/2008 10:37 AM Ignoramus25244 scribbled:
not for nuttin, anyone around here ever heard of trimming/snipping a post?
sheesh, its all the same nvidia screed anyway but applies to other posts
as well...
-
Re: Nvidia problems on Ubuntu 8.04
On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:49:14 -0500, Ignoramus25244 wrote:
> On 2008-07-31, Meat Plow wrote:
>> On Thu, 31 Jul 2008 12:20:08 -0500, Ignoramus25244 wrote:
>>
>>> On 2008-07-31, Meat Plow wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 14:33:23 -0500, Ignoramus19611 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 2008-07-30, Meat Plow wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 15:16:32 -0500, Ignoramus31137 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 2008-07-29, Ramon wrote:
>>>>>>>> Meat Plow wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 21:32:51 +0200, Ramon wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Recently I've tried to install Nvidia graphics card driver (on
>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu 8.04) by doing the following steps:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1] sudo apt-get install nvidia-glx-new [2] sudo
>>>>>>>>>> nvidia-xconfig
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The following error occurred when I've performed step [2]:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Using X configuration file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> VALIDATION ERROR: Data incomplete in file /etc/X11/xorg.conf.
>>>>>>>>>> Device section "Configured Video Device" must
>>>>>>>>>> have a
>>>>>>>>>> Driver line.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Backed up file '/etc/X11/xorg.conf' as
>>>>>>>>>> '/etc/X11/xorg.conf.backup' New X configuration file written to
>>>>>>>>>> '/etc/X11/xorg.conf'
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I've then restarted the X server (ctrl-alt-Delete since I am
>>>>>>>>>> using KDE) and the monitor suddenly turned off (there was no
>>>>>>>>>> display)!!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Probably, there is no display since my monitor's highest
>>>>>>>>>> resolution is 1024x768 and the graphics card driver is trying to
>>>>>>>>>> use a higher resolution (my graphics card is Nvidia 7300 GT).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Any suggestions?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Unfortunately "sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg" did not change
>>>>>>>> the displays situation!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have a strong feeling that there is no display since the nvidia
>>>>>>>> driver is trying to set a higher resolution than the monitor can
>>>>>>>> support. Is there a way how I can low the resolution?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That driver is junk. Try uninstalling it and doing
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What nvidia driver should be used and why is nvidia-glx-new junk?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> The standard open source driver (without 3D acceleration) should be
>>>>> used if your nvidia-glx-new makes your systemn unstable. The river is
>>>>> junk because it is full of bugs and is closed source.
>>>>
>>>> What bugs is it full of?
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Screen locking bugs, OS lockup bugs, and so on.
>>
>> Hmm that's a shame. I don't have any problems.
>>
>> http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/j...reenshot-2.jpg
>>
>> http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/j...reenshot-1.jpg
>>
>> http://i273.photobucket.com/albums/j.../snapshot4.jpg
>>
>>
>>
> Good for you. Nice newsgroup selection under your newsreader.
You mean the xp froup? Yeh I have a pal or two there. Was reading about a
small app like Compiz for XP. Haven't tried it yet, don't use the XP box
for much these days.
--
#1 Offishul Ruiner of Usenet, March 2007
#1 Usenet Asshole, March 2007
#10 Most hated Usenetizen of all time
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, June 2004
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker, May 2008
COOSN-266-06-25794
-
Re: Nvidia problems on Ubuntu 8.04
On Thu, -0700,
> anyone here heard trimming
I have heard something about trimming.
--
-
Re: Nvidia problems on Ubuntu 8.04
* Bob Martin peremptorily fired off this memo:
>>Are you saying that it did not work with any driver at all? Or that it
>>does not work with the "closed source driver"?
>
> Sorry, that was sloppy of me, I was in a hurry. I meant that all my attempts to
> get it working with other than "nv" have failed dismally, and judging by what I
> read on the web I am far from the only one.
> IOW - It's fine with nv
Read through /var/log/Xorg.log.0 and search for error markers ("EE").
It might be something a simple as not loading "glx" in xorg.conf.
I've also heard that Nvidia's writing over of the Mesa (OpenGL) files
can screw things up, though it's never happened to me. (People on the
Debian list keep telling me "it will, it will".)
--
Four thousand throats may be cut in one night by a running man.
-- Klingon Soldier, "Day of the Dove", stardate unknown
-
Re: Nvidia problems on Ubuntu 8.04
Ramon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Recently I've tried to install Nvidia graphics card driver (on Ubuntu
> 8.04) by doing the following steps:
>
> [1] sudo apt-get install nvidia-glx-new
> [2] sudo nvidia-xconfig
>
> The following error occurred when I've performed step [2]:
>
> ----------------------------------
> Using X configuration file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf".
>
> VALIDATION ERROR: Data incomplete in file /etc/X11/xorg.conf.
> Device section "Configured Video Device" must have a
> Driver line.
>
> Backed up file '/etc/X11/xorg.conf' as '/etc/X11/xorg.conf.backup'
> New X configuration file written to '/etc/X11/xorg.conf'
> ----------------------------------
>
> I've then restarted the X server (ctrl-alt-Delete
> since I am using KDE) and the monitor suddenly turned off (there was no
> display)!!
>
> Probably, there is no display since my monitor's highest resolution is
> 1024x768 and the graphics card driver is trying to use a higher
> resolution (my graphics card is Nvidia 7300 GT).
>
> Any suggestions?
>
Ok problem solved! Instead of installing nvidia-glx-new, if tried to
install nvidia-glx and now everything is working fine. It is strange
since my graphic card is relatively new (bought it last year).
Thanks to all of you.
--
E-mail address: ramif_47(at)yahoo.co.uk