Re: Top command
Trevor Best wrote:[color=blue]
> On Wed, 16 Jul 2008 22:04:24 -0500, John F. Morse wrote:
>> al wrote:
>>> John F. Morse wrote:
>>>> Are you saying that w, who and users show several root, hal-demo,
>>>> etc.? I don't think so.
>>>> You are instead looking at top. It shows the owners of processes, not
>>>> who is logged into your system.
>>> I thought you were saying those were switches to be used with top.
>>> Like top -w which wouldn't work and neither would the others. Learn
>>> something new everyday.
>> I never did like the term "switches." Reminds me too much of my
>> grandmother and the peach tree out back, and how she and her peach tree
>> switch could make me "dance" as she played her "music" on my calves. ;-)
>> Windows (DOS) uses that term, but Unix/Linux prefers "options" for the
>> same thing.
>> Besides, "options" sounds to me like I have some choice in the matter. ;-)
> Some people call them "arguments", you looking at my pint?[/color]
I won't argue that with you, even though I used to partake quarts, not
puny pints. ;-)
No Microsoft, Apple, AT&T, Intel, Novell, Trend Micro, nor Ford products were used in the preparation or transmission of this message.
The EULA sounds like it was written by a team of lawyers who want to tell me what I can't do. The GPL sounds like it was written by a human being, who wants me to know what I can do.