This is a discussion on Re: Rsync "roadmap" and version numbering (3.1.0 vs 3.0.4) - Tools ; On S 5 Jul, 2008, at 04:36 , Matt McCutchen wrote: > Those patches are Mac-specific, so I'm pretty sure they won't go into > the main rsync, but it would make sense to include them in > packagings of ...
On S 5 Jul, 2008, at 04:36 , Matt McCutchen wrote:
> Those patches are Mac-specific, so I'm pretty sure they won't go into
> the main rsync, but it would make sense to include them in
> packagings of
> rsync for Mac OS X. The two main packagings I know of are from Fink
> It appears that the Fink package includes the patches but the MacPorts
> one doesn't; someone should encourage the MacPorts people to add the
some people stay rightly away from either Fink and MacPorts, as these
are quite far from a vanillla MacOSX. I certainly don't use them and
still can build and install all that I need from sources. It would
make sense to keep those patches in the source in some system specific
directory (or in a contrib directory).
Please use reply-all for most replies to avoid omitting the mailing list.
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html