On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 02:36:18PM -0500, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> since all files must be read completely to compute the checksums, it
> isn't clear to me how [--checksum] is better than --ignore-times.


The way --checksum is better is that rsync outputs only the list of
actually changed files, unlike --ignore-times, where every file gets
mentioned (using -v or -i). There is also a difference in disk I/O
between --checksum and --ignore-times, though which one is better
depends on how many of the files are actually in need of transfer
(--checksum will use less when lots of files are identical, and use
more when lots of files are in need of updating).

...wayne..
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html