Hi,

On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Chris Shoemaker wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2005 at 08:12:30PM +0200, Eberhard Moenkeberg wrote:


>> The first pass of "rename-without-modification" could even be much easier:
>> size and timestamp should match.

>
> Eeek. That's a bit too risky for my tastes.
> I'd be comfortable with "Size && timestamp && (checksum || filename)"
> but not just "Size && timestamp".


Surely. But this first pass would reduce the necessity for the
checksumming pass a lot.
And the checksumming pass can stop on the first mismatch.

Cheers -e
--
Eberhard Moenkeberg (emoenke@gwdg.de, em@kki.org)
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html