https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3168

Summary: --min-size cores in 2.6.5 and is completely missing in
2.6.6
Product: rsync
Version: 2.6.6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: core
AssignedTo: wayned@samba.org
ReportedBy: foner-rsync-bugzilla@media.mit.edu
QAContact: rsync-qa@samba.org
CC: foner-rsync-bugzilla@media.mit.edu


--min-size is documented in 2.6.5 (manpage and --help) but segfaults in any
command I've tried it in.

It's vanished in 2.6.6, and seems to exist only as an unofficial patch. Why is
that?

I don't understand why --max-size is there but --min-size isn't, and the
misleading documentation of --min-size in 2.6.5's --help just screwed me, since
I've been mere hours from setting up a backup system that depended on its
presence. (--max-size worked just fine in testing; imagine my surprise when
--min-size cored and compiling the latest rsync caused it to vanish altogether!)

I'm on the mailing list and see no discussion of this change from the April
timeframe, which was when I thought it went into the mainline rsync. It's also
apparently not mentioned in any NEWS file. And searching for it in the bugzilla
hasn't turned up anything relevant.

Can this please be committed to the mainline version?

P.S. I -am- very pleased to see that --max-size, at least, worked when pulling
files from a 2.6.3 to a 2.6.5; I wasn't sure a priori if that would work, since
it wasn't clear who might be doing the filtering. (My guess is, "the sender if
it supports it, otherwise the receiver", but that's just a guess.) I'm hoping
that adding --min-size won't break this behavior, since the rsync I'm pulling
from may have to stay at 2.6.3 for a while.

--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.samba.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
--
To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/rsync
Before posting, read: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html