Chuck Taylor wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Is this worth someone picking it up or is it food for the dump?
>
> SUN SPARC Server 670MP with the following:
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> BOARD #1:
> (2) Boards on risers: marked "CYM 6002K Ross Technology" --- each with 2
> chips marked "ATT7C157M-20 9147K" and 6 chips with heat sinks.
>
> (32) Memory sticks: 16 are marked "Samsung KMM594000B-8 93110 SEC
> 16 are marked "NH4M09A0J-8 JAPAN 2415A07"
>
> In SBus 0 --- Ultra SCSI differential
> In SBus 1 --- Unknown: SCSI +?
>
> 15 pin ethernet port
> keyboard port
> Serial A & B
> Switch norm-diagnostic
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> BOARD #2
> Dataram
> (64) memory sticks
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Board #3 (was not pulled)
> Back shows: Status LEDs, diagnostic/norm switch, "IPI-2 Port" (50 pin?)
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> P/S
> +5v --- 150A
> -5.2v --- 15A
> +12v --- 15A
> +12v --- 15A/25A PK for 20 Sec.
> -12v --- 10A
> Total output not to exceed 925W
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> 50? pin port above boards (IPI-1?)
>
> Front panel reveals tape drive, CD and open bay with (SCSI?) cable dangling
> in back.
>
> QUESTION: Is this worth anything to anybody or is it food for the dump?
>
> If you want advise on a telescope, I can answer any of your questions. But I
> know nothing about SUN systems. I am told all the boards etc are working but
> have no way to verify. It is free to anyone who can pick it up (Tacoma, WA
> USA) and put it to use.
>
> Would someone let me know if this is worth anything
>
> Clear Skies
>
> Chuck Taylor
>
>
>
As a museum piece it might be of interest. As a piece of
computational equipment, I'd pass it up.

--
After being targeted with gigabytes of trash by the "SWEN" worm, I have
concluded we must conceal our e-mail address. Our true address is the
mirror image of what you see before the "@" symbol. It's a shame such
steps are necessary. ...Charlie