X2200 Remote Console stays "white" ??? - SUN

This is a discussion on X2200 Remote Console stays "white" ??? - SUN ; Hello list, Yesterday I installed two new X2200 systems, but am unable to get Remote Console to work. I can reach the ILO / ILOM just fine, reboot, etc. The small JAVA applet at the top even show the correct ...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: X2200 Remote Console stays "white" ???

  1. X2200 Remote Console stays "white" ???

    Hello list,

    Yesterday I installed two new X2200 systems, but am unable to get
    Remote Console to work. I can reach the ILO / ILOM just fine, reboot,
    etc. The small JAVA applet at the top even show the correct screen. But
    running the Remote Console application gives nothing (white screen).

    Tried Mozilla & Safari on Max OS.X and IE6 on Windows 2003. First ones
    gives white screen, second one ditto and hangs up the IE window.

    I see no traffic flowing but 2 TCP sessions open on ports 443 and 8600.
    Shouldn't there be more?


  2. Re: X2200 Remote Console stays "white" ???

    Welll, I sort'a fixed it. For some obscure reason the X2100M2 ILO will
    not run when placed behind a Cisco PIX firewall, even when the firewall
    is permitting all ports & traffic in and out. Very strange and not
    really what I was expecting. The X4100 ILO runs great, even using NAT
    on that...



    mousehouse wrote:
    > Hello list,
    >
    > Yesterday I installed two new X2200 systems, but am unable to get
    > Remote Console to work. I can reach the ILO / ILOM just fine, reboot,
    > etc. The small JAVA applet at the top even show the correct screen. But
    > running the Remote Console application gives nothing (white screen).
    >
    > Tried Mozilla & Safari on Max OS.X and IE6 on Windows 2003. First ones
    > gives white screen, second one ditto and hangs up the IE window.
    >
    > I see no traffic flowing but 2 TCP sessions open on ports 443 and 8600.
    > Shouldn't there be more?



  3. Re: X2200 Remote Console stays "white" ???

    Does the ILO (I guess this is the name for the console app?) use UDP or
    TCP? If TCP, I wouldn't expect a problem but if UDP, it might be the
    case that instead of sending MTU-sized packets, it sends larger packets
    as fragments. TCP shouldn't do this because packet size should simply
    be limited by MSS/MTU.

    The problem with fragmented packets and firewall is that Linux, which I
    am just assuming is the OS for the ILO, sends fragments backwards --
    last fragment first -- as an optimization. This breaks stateful firewalls,
    which includes NAT even without any firewall rules.

    -frank

    On 11 Oct 2006 11:10:12 -0700 "mousehouse" wrote:
    > Welll, I sort'a fixed it. For some obscure reason the X2100M2 ILO will
    > not run when placed behind a Cisco PIX firewall, even when the firewall
    > is permitting all ports & traffic in and out. Very strange and not
    > really what I was expecting. The X4100 ILO runs great, even using NAT
    > on that...
    >
    >
    >
    > mousehouse wrote:
    >> Hello list,
    >>
    >> Yesterday I installed two new X2200 systems, but am unable to get
    >> Remote Console to work. I can reach the ILO / ILOM just fine, reboot,
    >> etc. The small JAVA applet at the top even show the correct screen. But
    >> running the Remote Console application gives nothing (white screen).
    >>
    >> Tried Mozilla & Safari on Max OS.X and IE6 on Windows 2003. First ones
    >> gives white screen, second one ditto and hangs up the IE window.
    >>
    >> I see no traffic flowing but 2 TCP sessions open on ports 443 and 8600.
    >> Shouldn't there be more?


+ Reply to Thread