Why Sun are doomed - SUN
This is a discussion on Why Sun are doomed - SUN ; We got some new machines today. In the way of things they came with
power cables. These cables are *Revision 50*. Clearly, if Sun take 50
revisions to get a power cable right, there is no hope.
(Insert here a ...
-
Why Sun are doomed
We got some new machines today. In the way of things they came with
power cables. These cables are *Revision 50*. Clearly, if Sun take 50
revisions to get a power cable right, there is no hope.
(Insert here a whole long play one words about revisions, patches,
patch cables...)
--tim
This is a JOKE in case anyone wonders.
-
Re: Why Sun are doomed
On 26 Jan 2007 03:57:44 -0800,
Tim Bradshaw , in
<1169812664.657446.227850@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups. com> wrote:
>+ We got some new machines today. In the way of things they came with
>+ power cables. These cables are *Revision 50*. Clearly, if Sun take 50
>+ revisions to get a power cable right, there is no hope.
This leaves one to wonder how many years those revisions cover. The
variability of power cords can be staggering. I still treasure the
long, fat Sun cords from the late 90s.
>+ This is a JOKE in case anyone wonders.
*snork*
--
Consulting Minister for Consultants, DNRC
I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow
isn't looking good, either.
I am BOFH. Resistance is futile. Your network will be assimilated.
-
Re: Why Sun are doomed
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Tim Bradshaw wrote:
> We got some new machines today. In the way of things they came with
> power cables. These cables are *Revision 50*. Clearly, if Sun take 50
> revisions to get a power cable right, there is no hope.
I think you mis-understand Sun nomenclature. The revision to which
you refer applies to marketing, not engineering (which is the number
after the -). So part 370-1234-02 Rev 50 is the 2nd generation (from
an engineering point of view) of part number 370-1234. The Rev 50
just means that it took marketing 50 iterations to settle on "Sun Java
Power Cord[tm]".
:-)
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Online Inc.
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
-
Re: Why Sun are doomed
Actually rev 50 in Sun nomenclature means First Customer Ship (FCS).
So its actually the first version deemed acceptable to ship to
customers.
Rich Teer wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Tim Bradshaw wrote:
>
>> We got some new machines today. In the way of things they came with
>> power cables. These cables are *Revision 50*. Clearly, if Sun take 50
>> revisions to get a power cable right, there is no hope.
>
> I think you mis-understand Sun nomenclature. The revision to which
> you refer applies to marketing, not engineering (which is the number
> after the -). So part 370-1234-02 Rev 50 is the 2nd generation (from
> an engineering point of view) of part number 370-1234. The Rev 50
> just means that it took marketing 50 iterations to settle on "Sun Java
> Power Cord[tm]".
>
> :-)
>
--
Wayne Shaw Direct: 781-442-2152
Sun Microsystems, Inc. Fax: 781-442-2246
One Network Drive Internal: x22152
Mail Stop UBUR02-104 Email: wayne.shaw@sun.com
Burlington, MA 01803
-
Re: Why Sun are doomed
On 2007-01-26 17:59:26 +0000, Rich Teer said:
> I think you mis-understand Sun nomenclature. The revision to which
> you refer applies to marketing, not engineering (which is the number
> after the -). So part 370-1234-02 Rev 50 is the 2nd generation (from
> an engineering point of view) of part number 370-1234. The Rev 50
> just means that it took marketing 50 iterations to settle on "Sun Java
> Power Cord[tm]".
And in the usual Sun-marketing-****up way they missed a trick here. No
one wants Java power(ed) cords, they're big and slow and crash all the
time. No, what we want is CoolThreads ... ah I mean CoolCords, sorry.
(Though actually I don't think people who wear cords are ever cool are they).
That's quite enough
--tim
-
Re: Why Sun are doomed
I R A Darth Aggie writes:
>On 26 Jan 2007 03:57:44 -0800,
>Tim Bradshaw , in
><1169812664.657446.227850@a75g2000cwd.googlegroups. com> wrote:
>>+ We got some new machines today. In the way of things they came with
>>+ power cables. These cables are *Revision 50*. Clearly, if Sun take 50
>>+ revisions to get a power cable right, there is no hope.
>This leaves one to wonder how many years those revisions cover. The
>variability of power cords can be staggering. I still treasure the
>long, fat Sun cords from the late 90s.
This will be Suns revision 51 power cables:
http://www.lefflers.se/Library/Produ...ost/Brahma.htm
List price: 16.800 SEK (divide by 8 to get a rough US price in dollars).
Oh. Buy two, and you'll get a Sun Fire T1000 on the side!
-Peter
--
--
Peter Eriksson Phone: +46 13 28 2786
Computer Systems Manager/BOFH Cell/GSM: +46 705 18 2786
Physics Department, Linköping University Room: Building F, F203
-
Re: Why Sun are doomed
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Peter Eriksson wrote:
> This will be Suns revision 51 power cables:
>
> http://www.lefflers.se/Library/Produ...ost/Brahma.htm
Nordost... Very nice. I have one of their interconnects here
(specifically, Blue Heaven).
Nordost Valhalla, anyone?
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Online Inc.
Voice: +1 (250) 979-1638
URL: http://www.rite-group.com/rich
-
Re: Why Sun are doomed
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007 17:59:26 GMT,
Rich Teer , in
wrote:
>+ an engineering point of view) of part number 370-1234. The Rev 50
>+ just means that it took marketing 50 iterations to settle on "Sun Java
>+ Power Cord[tm]".
If Shakespeare where alive today, I think he might have wrote:
First, we kill all the marketers.
Tho lawyers still works in that context.
--
Consulting Minister for Consultants, DNRC
I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow
isn't looking good, either.
I am BOFH. Resistance is futile. Your network will be assimilated.