Printable View
In article <6msht7FiiaeeU2@mid.individual.net>, Arno Wagner
<me@privacy.net> writes
[color=blue]
>The only thing mildly suspicuous is the seek error rate.[/color]
What about the 'Hardware ECC Recovered' figure of 81?
--
(\__/) Bunny says NO to Windows Vista!
(='.'=) [url]http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/vista_cost.html[/url]
(")_(") [url]http://www.cypherpunks.to/~peter/vista.pdf[/url]
Previously Mike Tomlinson <mike@jasper.org.uk> wrote:[color=blue]
> In article <6msht7FiiaeeU2@mid.individual.net>, Arno Wagner
> <me@privacy.net> writes[/color]
[color=blue][color=green]
>>The only thing mildly suspicuous is the seek error rate.[/color][/color]
[color=blue]
> What about the 'Hardware ECC Recovered' figure of 81?[/color]
That should be a secondary effect from imprecise seeks and may even be
normal. 81 (of 100) also does not strike me as remarkable.
Admittedly, it could be soemthing in its of right, but as several
people here have shown, ECC recovery figures are diffivuult to
interpret.
Arno