The limits are the same for both. This paper has the most recent information
(some errors still in this paper - I made a few corrections)

http://download.microsoft.com/downlo...c#_Toc74470141

Check back for any updates.

Feature
OS version
Theoretical
Tested

Maximum NTFS volume size
Windows 2000 Server
256 Terabytes (64 TB with Windows Volume Manager)


16 Terabytes using 64 KB cluster size



Windows Server 2003
256 Terabytes (64 TB with Windows Volume Manager)


16 Terabytes using 64 KB cluster size

Maximum dynamic volume size
Windows 2000 Server
256 Terabytes (64 TB with Windows Volume Manager)
2 Terabytes basic volume

64 Terabytes (Raid-0)

62 Terabytes (RAID-5)

Window Server 2003
256 Terabytes (64 TB with Windows Volume Manager)
2 Terabytes basic volume

64 Terabytes (Raid-0)

62 Terabytes (RAID-5)

Maximum file size on a volume


Windows 2000 Server
16 terabytes
16 Terabytes using 64 KB clusters

Window Server 2003
16 terabytes
16 Terabytes using 64 KB clusters

Maximum number of files on a volume
Windows 2000 Server
4,294,967,295 files
20,000,000 files

Window Server 2003
4,294,967,295 files
4,294,967,295 files

Maximum number of volumes per server
Windows 2000 Server

~1400 volumes

Window Server 2003
none (basic)

~1000 dynamic
~2000 volumes



"Chaz Spahn" wrote in message
news:ezKku8VhEHA.2052@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>I have been searching everywhere on the MS site and can not find the max
>addressible storage limit for Windows Server 2003 or Windows Storage Server
>2003. I need to know the difference between the two if there is one and
>what WSS can handle.
>
> Any help would be appreciated!
> Chaz Spahn, MCSE:Security
>