This is a discussion on RE: [squid-users] .cgi webmail password caching problem - squid ; =20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:hno@squid-cache.org]=20 > Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 8:03 PM > To: Dan Didier > Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org > Subject: Re: [squid-users] .cgi webmail password caching problem >=20 > On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, ...
=20
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henrik Nordstrom [mailto:hno@squid-cache.org]=20
> Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 8:03 PM
> To: Dan Didier
> Cc: squid-users@squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] .cgi webmail password caching problem
>=20
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Dan Didier wrote:
>=20
> > Hopefully someone here can shed some light on my problem. =20
> I recently=20
> > installed a squid box for my users, and everything was going great=20
> > until we started using a new webmail interface which is=20
> writen in .cgi
>=20
> Odd.
>=20
> > Now, here is the weird part, if I go to the mailbox and=20
> open a message=20
> > and then click on the inbox button it shoots me back to the login. =20
> > Here is the correspondinig log entry:
> >=20
> > 1077237858.070 390 192.168.100.254 TCP_MISS/200 5473 GET
> >=20
> http://wbsmail.webbuildersolution.co...c8cb9dcf0dee4a
> > a0 /readmail.44775.cgi? - DIRECT/167.68.25.107 text/html
> >=20
> > Next if I simply hit the back button and do it again, it lets me in!
> > Here is the log entry:
> >=20
> > 1077237920.306 982 192.168.100.254 TCP_MISS/200 36446 GET
> >=20
> http://wbsmail.webbuildersolution.co...c8cb9dcf0dee4a
> > a0 /readmail.44775.cgi? - DIRECT/167.68.25.76 text/html
> >=20
> >=20
> > It is exactly the same!!!
>=20
> Except that the size differs significantly so the response is=20
> different.
>=20
> Try if you can see any difference with the following set in=20
> squid.conf:
>=20
> strip_query_terms off
> log_mime_hdrs on
>=20
> If you still does not see any difference then the application=20
> is broken.
>=20
> Setting "server_persistent_connections off" may help, and if=20
> this makes a difference in either way then it is proven the=20
> application is broken.
>=20
> Regards
> Henrik
>=20
>=20
Hendrik,
Why does it work in transparent mode?
Thanks,
Dan