Re: Am I an idiot, or is bayes broken on my system?
On 10.11.08 11:30, Troy Settle wrote:[color=blue]
> I received a piece of junkmail this morning:
> In the spam report, I see this: BAYES_00=-2.599
> So, I run it through sa-learn with --spam:
> Learned tokens from 1 message(s) (1 message(s) examined)
> Then, I re-scan it using spamc, and still I get:
> What gives? I don't expect the total score to come up much, but the
> bayes should at least go from a negative number to a positive number...
> shouldn't it?
> BTW, this is the 3rd or 4th annuity/insurance spam I've received and
> piped through sa-learn in the last few days (I don't have samples of the
> others, but I'll definitely keep samples of future such messages).[/color]
are you sure spamc and spamassassin use the same BAYES dsatabase?
Did you try giving your uername to spamd via '-u' ?
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email]firstname.lastname@example.org[/email] ; [url]http://www.fantomas.sk/[/url]
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759