Jeff Mincy writes:
>
>
> 72_active.cf has a bunch of replace_tag definitions that seem to be an
> almost exact copy of the replace_tag definitions in 25_replace.cf.
> For example:
>
> % egrep 'replace_tag\W+A\W+' /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005/updates_spamassassin_org/*.cf
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005/updates_spamassassin_org/25_replace.cf:replace_tag A [gra\@\xc0\xc1\xc2\xc3\xc4\xc5\xc6\xe4\xe3\xe2\xe0\ xe1\xe2\xe3\xe4\xe5\xe60o]
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005/updates_spamassassin_org/72_active.cf:replace_tag A [gra\@\xc0\xc1\xc2\xc3\xc4\xc5\xc6\xe4\xe3\xe2\xe0\ xe1\xe2\xe3\xe4\xe5\xe60o]
>
> Why are all the tags being redefined?
>
> 72_active.cf seems to have several undefined rules.
> % egrep T_FRT_ABSOLUT /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005/updates_spamassassin_org/*.cf
> /var/lib/spamassassin/3.002005/updates_spamassassin_org/72_active.cf:replace_rules T_FRT_ABSOLUT
>
> where is T_FRT_ABSOLUT defined? Shouldn't there be a header or body
> rule somewhere.


Hmm. I suspect this is a bug; those are testing rule names and they
shouldn't be making it into the published updates.

--j.