-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Micah Anderson wrote:
[...]
> Report them where exactly?
>
> Here is an example one I received recently, note the hideously low bayes
> score on this one, caused it to autolearn as ham even, grr.
>
>
> From mayodayo@3web.net Fri Oct 31 20:00:45 2008
> Return-Path:
> X-OfflineIMAP-x792266711-4c6f63616c-494e424f58: 1225549253-0134941395044-v6.0.3
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on spamd2.riseup.net
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
> autolearn=ham version=3.2.5
> Delivered-To: micah@riseup.net
> Received: from mx1.riseup.net (unknown [10.8.0.3])
> by cormorant.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58BFA19581F7
> for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:00:40 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: from master.debian.org (master.debian.org [70.103.162.29])
> by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA4465701D1
> for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2008 20:00:39 -0700 (PDT)

[...]
Contact debian.org's list manager instead of other actions. That's more
reasonable. And more, i think we need to study about DKIM specification
[RFC4871] to make the Internet of trust ;;

byunghee
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkkNE/oACgkQsCouaZaxlv5YqACeIozvqJ96tTKm4oLnRySHAfc1
xUIAoI0G4FXr+PqdqvULxm0V+xZOSP77
=8NV0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----