Kevin Windham wrote:
> The other sign is the encoded img tags. I can't recall seeing a regular
> site use img tags that are encoded with no meaningful name.

I take it you've never looked at the HTML code for, say, Flickr or
Amazon? A *lot* of dynamic websites will use a catalog number (or
equivalent) instead of a human-readable name for their image filenames.

--
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate Communications