> >On Wed, 2008-10-29 at 07:52 -0700, John Hardin wrote:
> >>I'm going to suggest again that, given how much pain it causes noobs,
> >>perhaps the use of whitelist_from should generate a lint _warning_ that it
> >>should only be used if no other whitelist method will work...

> On Wed, 29 Oct 2008, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
> >The thing with noobs and whitelist_from (according to my experience on
> >this list) appears to be a lack of reading. I got the impression most of
> >them just blindly whitelist_from their own domain to be on the safe
> >side, without any prior investigation and usually without any need.

On 29.10.08 11:15, John Hardin wrote:
> Agreed, and if they aren't reading the documentation carefully enough to
> see the warnings about using whitelist_from, then they probably aren't
> running a lint either...
> However, if emitting a warning in lint saves having some "why are spams
> hitting USER_IN_WHITELIST??" messages sent to the list, it's probably
> worth doing.

Actually, it's completely safe to whitelist some domains, if your MTA does
the SPF check for you, and you expect no fails to pass fotr those domains...

Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
There's a long-standing bug relating to the x86 architecture that
allows you to install Windows. -- Matthew D. Fuller