....if the URI is not listed in www.uribl.com ?

Return-Path:
Received: from [...] (sending to my server)
Received: from pikachu.nic.ar (unknown [140.191.48.11])
by maderna.nic.ar (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E07D7049;
Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:23:19 -0200 (ARST)
Received: by pikachu.nic.ar (Postfix, from userid 2)
id 0C59B17873; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:23:18 -0200 (ARST)
Subject: Solicitud de Modificacion de Datos de xxxx.com.ar Recibida
From: tramites-ack@nic.ar
To: tramites-ack@nic.ar
Reply-To: info@nic.ar
Errors-To: domar_errors@mrecic.gov.ar
Message-Id: <20081029142319.0C59B17873@pikachu.nic.ar>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 12:23:18 -0200 (ARST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at xxxxx.com
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=6.469 required=5 tests=[DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.479,
DNS_FROM_RFC_POST=1.44, EXCLAMACION_ES=1, NO_REAL_NAME=0.55, URIBL_BLACK=3]
X-Spam-Score: 6.469
X-Spam-Level: ******
X-Spam-Flag: YES



Another message from the same domain doesn't hit the rule

Return-Path:
Received: from [...] (sending to my server, same route)
Received: from pikachu.nic.ar (unknown [140.191.48.11])
by maderna.nic.ar (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDD3D70A4;
Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:22:41 -0200 (ARST)
Received: by pikachu.nic.ar (Postfix, from userid 2)
id 1E9C917873; Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:22:41 -0200 (ARST)
Subject: Solicitud de Renovacion de xxxx.net.ar Recibida
From: tramites-ack@nic.ar
To: tramites-ack@nic.ar
Reply-To: info@nic.ar
Errors-To: domar_errors@mrecic.gov.ar
Message-Id: <20081029152241.1E9C917873@pikachu.nic.ar>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:22:41 -0200 (ARST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at xxxx.com
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.469 required=5 tests=[DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE=0.479,
DNS_FROM_RFC_POST=1.44, EXCLAMACION_ES=1, NO_REAL_NAME=0.55]
X-Spam-Score: 3.469
X-Spam-Level: ***


I am using spamassassin through amavis and rules where updated last week.
And no, it was not delisted in the last our, the same happened a couple
of hours ago with two messages from the same place

Thanks
Claudia Burman
Argentina