Heinrich Christian Peters wrote on Wed, 22 Oct 2008 14:30:13 +0200:

> Why? Won't Bayes get better, if I tell spamassassin more clearly, which
> mails are spam *and* which are not?

In general, yes. But we were talking about a specific context (MailScanner
quarantine and automated Bayes learning beyond that what SA already does)
and in this context it's undesirable (prone to FPs) and unlikely to even
exist (do you archive all ham? In some countries that may even be


Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com