Example headers?

Output of spamassassin --lint ?

mmedlin99 wrote:
> Running SA version 3.2.4
> amavisd-new version 2.2.1
> Postfix version 2.5.2
> Upgraded postfix from version 2.1.x to 2.5.2 just a few hours ago.
> Now Spamassassin is giving everything a score of 0, even the obvious spam.
> Worked properly just minutes before I ran the upgrade.
> Looked at all the logs for Postfix, amavisd-new, and spamassassin, and
> cannot see any errors or warnings, but Spamassassin just passes all messages
> now without giving a score or a score of 0.
> I anyone can point me in the right direction of what I need to be looking at
> I thank you in advance.
>
> mmedlin99
>

On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 10:41 -0700, Evan Platt wrote:
> Example headers?
>

> Output of spamassassin --lint ?
>

Since he's running amavisd-new, running `amavisd -c blah.conf debug-sa`
would probably provide the most information...


> mmedlin99 wrote:
> > Running SA version 3.2.4
> > amavisd-new version 2.2.1
> > Postfix version 2.5.2
> > Upgraded postfix from version 2.1.x to 2.5.2 just a few hours ago.
> > Now Spamassassin is giving everything a score of 0, even the obvious spam.
> > Worked properly just minutes before I ran the upgrade.
> > Looked at all the logs for Postfix, amavisd-new, and spamassassin, and
> > cannot see any errors or warnings, but Spamassassin just passes all messages
> > now without giving a score or a score of 0.

--
Daniel J McDonald, CCIE #2495, CISSP #78281, CNX
Austin Energy
http://www.austinenergy.com


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEABECAAYFAkhhPUsACgkQGvhCU13z7IjRAgCfS4h3vT7wpk 1GWx6hrEGu7+/h
u2kAoKFsvMXi07db8lBmUGzJpeJaaVFh
=yWEW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Thanks for responding,
Output of spamassassin --lint is ..nothing. It just does it's thing and
returns to the prompt. From what I've read no messages should be a good
thing.
You;ll have to forgive me I'm sometimes not so bright, I assumed that
"blah.conf" meant "amavisd.conf".
Ran what you suggested, and redirected output to a text file, (after 7
minutes it went over 200KB).
Looked through the file, no "Error", "Halting", "Panic", etc that I could
see.
I don't know if it will help, but something I did see were these lines:
dbg: check: is spam? score=0 required=5
dbg: check: tests=
I saw them in relation to all the messages that came in while the "debug"
was running, and Spamassassin was, I assume, doing its thing.
Don't know if it helps either but in the log file for
Postfix,(/var/log/mail/info) there is a string "delays=12/0.01/0.01/10,
dsn=2.6.0"(number after dalays= changes every time, but dsn=2.6.0 stays the
same). This string showed up at 4:15am CDT,(2 minutes after I had started
Postfix after upgrading) and shows up for every message that has come in
since then. It does not show up in the log file before then.
If any of this is meaningful to someone, and they can give me any clues,
again thanks in advance.

mmedlin99



McDonald, Dan wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2008-06-24 at 10:41 -0700, Evan Platt wrote:
>> Example headers?
>>
>
>> Output of spamassassin --lint ?
>>
>
> Since he's running amavisd-new, running `amavisd -c blah.conf debug-sa`
> would probably provide the most information...
>
>
>> mmedlin99 wrote:
>> > Running SA version 3.2.4
>> > amavisd-new version 2.2.1
>> > Postfix version 2.5.2
>> > Upgraded postfix from version 2.1.x to 2.5.2 just a few hours ago.
>> > Now Spamassassin is giving everything a score of 0, even the obvious
>> spam.
>> > Worked properly just minutes before I ran the upgrade.
>> > Looked at all the logs for Postfix, amavisd-new, and spamassassin, and
>> > cannot see any errors or warnings, but Spamassassin just passes all
>> messages
>> > now without giving a score or a score of 0.
>
> --
> Daniel J McDonald, CCIE #2495, CISSP #78281, CNX
> Austin Energy
> http://www.austinenergy.com
>
>
>
>

--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/SA-no-longer-s...p18098572.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.