Re: trusted mailing list subscriber spam - SpamAssassin

This is a discussion on Re: trusted mailing list subscriber spam - SpamAssassin ; ...

+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Re: trusted mailing list subscriber spam

  1. Re: trusted mailing list subscriber spam


  2. Re: trusted mailing list subscriber spam

    > On Sun, May 11, 2008 22:39, mouss wrote:
    >
    > > a +all and you are annoying us about forwarding and SPF?


    On 12.05.08 23:07, Benny Pedersen wrote:
    > he, i have +all and forward nothing


    it's not about what do you forward, it's about others forwarding your
    e-mail (without rewriting mail from: which is a bad thing).

    > stop annoying me that spf cant be used


    Don't wonder if anyone will reject or flag your e-mail because havinr "+all"
    in SPF

    --
    Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
    Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
    Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
    One OS to rule them all, One OS to find them,
    One OS to bring them all and into darkness bind them


  3. Re: trusted mailing list subscriber spam


    On Tue, May 13, 2008 15:19, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:

    > Don't wonder if anyone will reject or flag your e-mail because havinr "+all"
    > in SPF


    yes i need to implement srs to fix it better ?

    come on, srs and +all it imho the same seen to the recipient

    diff is that i dont use srs installed anywhere

    fact:
    v=spf1 +all < this is bad !
    v=spf1 mx +all < this is not

    if admins see them as equal, blame them


    Benny Pedersen
    Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098


  4. Re: trusted mailing list subscriber spam

    > On Tue, May 13, 2008 15:19, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
    >
    > > Don't wonder if anyone will reject or flag your e-mail because havinr "+all"
    > > in SPF


    On 13.05.08 21:29, Benny Pedersen wrote:
    > yes i need to implement srs to fix it better ?


    no, forwarders need to.

    > come on, srs and +all it imho the same seen to the recipient


    it's not, they are much different.

    > diff is that i dont use srs installed anywhere
    >
    > fact:
    > v=spf1 +all < this is bad !
    > v=spf1 mx +all < this is not
    >
    > if admins see them as equal, blame them


    spammers will use whatever they'll see people don't catch.
    you just told all spammers to use "mx +all" in SPF records for their domains
    to be able to use them for world-wide spamming
    --
    Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
    Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
    Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
    Linux is like a teepee: no Windows, no Gates and an apache inside...


  5. Re: trusted mailing list subscriber spam


    On Tue, May 13, 2008 23:09, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:

    > spammers will use whatever they'll see people don't catch.
    > you just told all spammers to use "mx +all" in SPF records for their domains
    > to be able to use them for world-wide spamming


    basic score in spf is olso very low pr default, one still have to
    whitelist_from_spf if recipient agre this domain does not send spam


    Benny Pedersen
    Need more webspace ? http://www.servage.net/?coupon=cust37098


+ Reply to Thread