Re: Low Scores on Bounce Backs
Joseph Brennan wrote:[color=blue]
> Jeff Koch <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:[color=green]
> > One of the problems is that the actual spam email is sometimes not
> > attached. But interestly enough we are usually sent the email header of
> > the original email. From that we (the humans) can easily spot that the IP
> > address of the mailserver claiming to be ours is, in fact, not. So, if
> > that line in the returned email header can be parsed perhaps a program
> > can validate the IP address.[/color]
> Check the precise format, but if you have something like this in the
> original header, with your host's name...
> (hostname.example.com [126.96.36.199])
> ...and that's not the right IP, that would be a good test.
> It sounds like you could get that with a 'body' rule.[/color]
A 'body' rule does not see a header section of an attached mail,
a 'full' rule is needed, as pointed out elsewhere
(but the 'full' rule sees a main header section too).