This is a discussion on Re: Low Scores on Bounce Backs - SpamAssassin ; > On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:13:09PM +1200, Jason Haar wrote: > > > > ...and the score is 0.1 - and I don't fiddle with SA scores as a rule > > 'cause you guys > > Know ...
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:13:09PM +1200, Jason Haar wrote:
> > ...and the score is 0.1 - and I don't fiddle with SA scores as a rule
> > 'cause you guys
> > Know Best (TM).
On 11.04.08 12:17, Henrik K wrote:
> No, the guys can't know what the best scores are for _your_ system.
> Therefore if you want efficient SA, you need to modify many scores, possibly
> running mass-checks for your traffic.
I think many of people can't run such mass-checks so they just have to
accept what SA people set up. Playing with scores and setting them w/o
mass-checks can be quite dangerous. This thread shows some examples
And it's sometimes better to ask why scores are as high as they are instead
of blindly changing them - we may learn something new.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, firstname.lastname@example.org ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Spam = (S)tupid (P)eople's (A)dvertising (M)ethod