Re: Low Scores on Bounce Backs
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 09:13:09PM +1200, Jason Haar wrote:[color=blue][color=green]
> > ...and the score is 0.1 - and I don't fiddle with SA scores as a rule
> > 'cause you guys
> > Know Best (TM).[/color][/color]
On 11.04.08 12:17, Henrik K wrote:[color=blue]
> No, the guys can't know what the best scores are for _your_ system.
> Therefore if you want efficient SA, you need to modify many scores, possibly
> running mass-checks for your traffic.[/color]
I think many of people can't run such mass-checks so they just have to
accept what SA people set up. Playing with scores and setting them w/o
mass-checks can be quite dangerous. This thread shows some examples :)
And it's sometimes better to ask why scores are as high as they are instead
of blindly changing them - we may learn something new.
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, [email]firstname.lastname@example.org[/email] ; [url]http://www.fantomas.sk/[/url]
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Spam = (S)tupid (P)eople's (A)dvertising (M)ethod