Ed Kasky wrote:
> On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Matt Kettler wrote:
>
>> SM wrote:
>>> At 04:46 04-04-2008, Matt Kettler wrote:
>>>> However, in this case it looks purely accidental. That appears to
>>>> be a legitimate HTML document, or at least doesn't appear to be
>>>> intentionally malformed.
>>>
>>> In this case, the message wasn't formatted correctly as it's going
>>> to be rendered as a blank message (excluding attachments) by most MUAs.

>>
>> Out of curiosity, did you spot where the error in the formatting is?
>> I looked at the message and failed to spot it...

>
> Not real sure but could it have something to do with the boundary?
>
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="----------6622964ADDB6E4"
> Received-SPF: none (yoda.wrenkasky.com: domain of
> visualiser@dkunath.de does not designate permitted sender hosts)
> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.92.1/6568/Thu Apr 3 09:12:56 2008 on
> yoda.wrenkasky.com
> X-Virus-Status: Clean
> Content-Length: 3009
> Status: RO
> X-Status:
> X-Keywords:
> X-UID: 2
>
> ------------6622964ADDB6E4
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> Ahn nyeong,
> ^^^^^^^^^^ this is where the text started but for me was only visible
> if I viewed full headers in pine or viewed the raw message...


I see no problem with the boundary. can you configure your mailers to
show text instead of html and try again?

For info, thunderbird shows the message (not blank). didn't test with
other MUAs.