This is a discussion on Re: SA UNPARSEABLE_RELAY when host name in ( ) causes - SpamAssassin ; At 03:57 12-03-2008, Steve Radich wrote: >I'm unclear if this is RFC compliant or not, the specs DO say in Section >3.8.2 "environments may not conform eactly to this specification" - see >other RFC references.. SpamAssassin doesn't verify RFC compliance. ...
At 03:57 12-03-2008, Steve Radich wrote:
>I'm unclear if this is RFC compliant or not, the specs DO say in Section
>3.8.2 "environments may not conform eactly to this specification" - see
>other RFC references..
SpamAssassin doesn't verify RFC compliance.
>The following line causes UNPARSEABLE_RELAY:
>
>Received: from host1.internal (host1.internal) by host2.internal
>(63.218.155.52) with ESMTP id m27NKoCv031779 for;
>Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:20:50 -0600
>
>Simply changing the host IP to host1.internal in ( ) as below causes it
>to parse:
>
> Received: from host1.internal (63.218.155.52) by host2.internal
>(63.218.155.52) with ESMTP id m27NKoCv031779 for;
>Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:20:50 -0600
>
>We have a site that we whitelist via whitelist_from_rcvd so when we get
>UNPARSEABLE_RELAY it ignores the whitelist. This SEEMS like a bug in
>spamassassin.
I suggest using the Received line that is parsed correctly. If it's
a mail server adding the Received line, you could file a bug report.
Regards,
-sm