On 04.03.08 17:56, Penghui Wang wrote:
> There are several lines like the follow
>
> header __HAS_SUBJECT exists:Subject
> meta MISSING_SUBJECT !__HAS_SUBJECT
> describe MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
>
> In the VERSION 3.0.5 and 3.2.4, i found whether or not the mail have a
> "Subject" in the header part, the MISSING_SUBJECT rules has been hitted.
> But in the last version 3.1.7, it works great.
>
> And the same condition with other similar rules, such as __HAS_REVD,
> __HAS_RECEIVED etc..
>
> I have diged this for about one day. But there's no result. Does anyone
> meet the same problem? Please drop me a message.\


afaik those headers have to be non-empty, e.g. empty Subject: header matches
the MISSING_SUBJECT too.

--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
"They say when you play that M$ CD backward you can hear satanic messages."
"That's nothing. If you play it forward it will install Windows."