Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> > From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:Bowie_Bailey@BUC.com]
> >
> > Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:
> > > > From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:Bowie_Bailey@BUC.com]
> > > >
> > > > I would say that sa-compile is the preferred method due to its
> > > > performance benefits. There aren't many (any?) drawbacks to
> > > > using it.
> > >
> > > I don't use it here because it takes too long (over 20 minutes) to
> > > compile. (This is with SA v3.2.4, which is a big improvement over
> > > v3.2.3)

> >
> > Why is this an issue? You only have to recompile the rules if
> > there is an update and this is only once every week or two even
> > when things are active.

>
> We have a lot of local rules that I fine-tune often, sometimes
> several times a day.


In that case, I guess you will have to decide if the speed increase is worth
the compile time.

--
Bowie