RE: sa-compile format the standard now?
Rosenbaum, Larry M. wrote:[color=blue][color=green]
> > From: Bowie Bailey [mailto:Bowie_Bailey@BUC.com]
> > I would say that sa-compile is the preferred method due to its
> > performance benefits. There aren't many (any?) drawbacks to using
> > it.[/color]
> I don't use it here because it takes too long (over 20 minutes) to
> compile. (This is with SA v3.2.4, which is a big improvement over
Why is this an issue? You only have to recompile the rules if there is
an update and this is only once every week or two even when things are
I have an update script that runs nightly via cron. It runs sa-update
and if there are updates, it runs sa-compile and then restarts spamd.
If you are paranoid, you could skip the automatic restart and do the
restart manually the next morning.