On 10/25/2007 9:13 AM, Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Oct 2007, ram wrote:
>> Sorry I meant "like spamcop" .. I think I must proof-read my own mail
>> now before Ctrl-Enter :-)

> The problem with SpamCop is: the two step reporting process makes things
> a bear to do. I understand the logic behind it, but once or twice I've
> taken a couple hundred spam emails and spamassassin -r'd it...annoying
> as hell.
> I'd like it if they open-sourced their analysis engine so people could
> use it to report spam privately, but I know it's not happening.

every thought about getting "quick" reporting status?
(inluding "mole"?)

I haven't ACKD'd a report in years :-)