Dan Barker wrote:

> Hold on! If you are USING the affected system, then since you replied=


> to me directly instead of through the list, I have your message
> headers, and they went through my SpamAssassin, and did not trigger
> the INVALID_DATE rule.


Yep, same here. The Date header looks fine to me.=20


/Per Jessen, Z=C3=BCrich